Direct democracy and resource allocation: Experimental evidence from Afghanistan

Direct democracy is designed to better align policy outcomes with citizen preferences. To test this proposition, we randomized whether 250 villages across Afghanistan selected projects by secret-ballot referenda or by consultation meetings. We find that referenda reduce the influence of local elites...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beath, Andrew, Christia, Fotini, Enikolopov, Ruben
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier BV 2020
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/127650
_version_ 1811086740770783232
author Beath, Andrew
Christia, Fotini
Enikolopov, Ruben
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
Beath, Andrew
Christia, Fotini
Enikolopov, Ruben
author_sort Beath, Andrew
collection MIT
description Direct democracy is designed to better align policy outcomes with citizen preferences. To test this proposition, we randomized whether 250 villages across Afghanistan selected projects by secret-ballot referenda or by consultation meetings. We find that referenda reduce the influence of local elites over both project type and location. Consistent with previous experimental results, we also find that referenda improve villagers' perceptions of the local economy and of the quality of local governance. However, we find no systematic evidence that selecting projects via referenda increases the average impact of such projects.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T13:33:58Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/127650
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T13:33:58Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier BV
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1276502022-10-01T15:43:50Z Direct democracy and resource allocation: Experimental evidence from Afghanistan Beath, Andrew Christia, Fotini Enikolopov, Ruben Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science Direct democracy is designed to better align policy outcomes with citizen preferences. To test this proposition, we randomized whether 250 villages across Afghanistan selected projects by secret-ballot referenda or by consultation meetings. We find that referenda reduce the influence of local elites over both project type and location. Consistent with previous experimental results, we also find that referenda improve villagers' perceptions of the local economy and of the quality of local governance. However, we find no systematic evidence that selecting projects via referenda increases the average impact of such projects. Army Research Office (Award W911NF-12-1-0509) 2020-09-17T21:24:10Z 2020-09-17T21:24:10Z 2017-01 2016-10 2019-09-26T14:00:32Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0304-3878 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/127650 Beath, Andrew et al. "Direct democracy and resource allocation: Experimental evidence from Afghanistan." Journal of Development Economics 124 (January 2017): 199-213 © 2016 Elsevier B.V. en http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.10.001 Journal of Development Economics Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ application/pdf Elsevier BV SSRN
spellingShingle Beath, Andrew
Christia, Fotini
Enikolopov, Ruben
Direct democracy and resource allocation: Experimental evidence from Afghanistan
title Direct democracy and resource allocation: Experimental evidence from Afghanistan
title_full Direct democracy and resource allocation: Experimental evidence from Afghanistan
title_fullStr Direct democracy and resource allocation: Experimental evidence from Afghanistan
title_full_unstemmed Direct democracy and resource allocation: Experimental evidence from Afghanistan
title_short Direct democracy and resource allocation: Experimental evidence from Afghanistan
title_sort direct democracy and resource allocation experimental evidence from afghanistan
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/127650
work_keys_str_mv AT beathandrew directdemocracyandresourceallocationexperimentalevidencefromafghanistan
AT christiafotini directdemocracyandresourceallocationexperimentalevidencefromafghanistan
AT enikolopovruben directdemocracyandresourceallocationexperimentalevidencefromafghanistan