Mudstones and embedded concretions show differences in lithology-related, but not source-related biomarker distributions

The mudstones of the Western Australian Gogo Formation harbour numerous carbonate concretions which often contain preserved fossils of Lagerstätte-like quality. These are especially notable in places where the mudstone has eroded, giving way to nodule fields, which afford valuable paleobiological re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lengger, Sabine K., Melendez, Ines M., Summons, Roger E, Grice, Kliti
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier BV 2020
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/127799
_version_ 1811070242033500160
author Lengger, Sabine K.
Melendez, Ines M.
Summons, Roger E
Grice, Kliti
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Lengger, Sabine K.
Melendez, Ines M.
Summons, Roger E
Grice, Kliti
author_sort Lengger, Sabine K.
collection MIT
description The mudstones of the Western Australian Gogo Formation harbour numerous carbonate concretions which often contain preserved fossils of Lagerstätte-like quality. These are especially notable in places where the mudstone has eroded, giving way to nodule fields, which afford valuable paleobiological records. It is, however, a challenge to determine their paleoenvironmental context. Here, we analysed concretions from a core drilled in the Canning Basin Gogo Formation. At two different depths, concretions were compared to the surrounding mudstone found at the same depth. Electron microscopy and X-ray spectroscopy showed that the concretions were carbonate-rich and contained detrital fragments. Biomarker data showed that mudstone and concretions had very similar distributions and presented marine biosignatures including indicators of anoxic depositional conditions, a stratified water column, and photic zone euxinia. The concretions contained higher amounts of C27 steranes, indicating that more labile organic matter such as animal remains could have triggered concretion formation. Statistical analyses of the results showed that concretions and shales differed (p < 0.1) in indices diagnostic for lithologies (and often related to maturity), particularly in the sample recovered from the younger section of the core: the diasterane/sterane indices at each of the depths were 0.34 in the shale vs 0.12 in the concretion in the younger set of samples, and 0.21 vs 0.19 in the older set. The homohopane isomerisation indices of the mudstone and concretion were 0.66 vs 0.58 and 0.62 vs 0.60 (47 and 54 m depth, respectively). Furthermore, shales contained higher relative amounts of moretanes. Concretions also differed from the mudstone in their methylhopane distributions, with shales showing higher amounts of 3-methylhopanes. Conversely, when biomarker composition was compared at the two depths, they only differed significantly (p < 0.1) in the 2-methylhopane index,%C31 homohopanes, and hopane/sterane ratios (p < 0.1). Our results show that the biomarker composition of the mudstone at the time of deposition is largely preserved in the concretions with only a minor overprint from diagenesis, bacterial communities involved in concretion formation, or the organic matter nucleus. It is therefore possible to use biomarker analysis on carbonate concretions to determine their provenance if found outside their immediate geological context.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T08:33:22Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/127799
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T08:33:22Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier BV
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1277992022-09-30T09:34:58Z Mudstones and embedded concretions show differences in lithology-related, but not source-related biomarker distributions Lengger, Sabine K. Melendez, Ines M. Summons, Roger E Grice, Kliti Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences The mudstones of the Western Australian Gogo Formation harbour numerous carbonate concretions which often contain preserved fossils of Lagerstätte-like quality. These are especially notable in places where the mudstone has eroded, giving way to nodule fields, which afford valuable paleobiological records. It is, however, a challenge to determine their paleoenvironmental context. Here, we analysed concretions from a core drilled in the Canning Basin Gogo Formation. At two different depths, concretions were compared to the surrounding mudstone found at the same depth. Electron microscopy and X-ray spectroscopy showed that the concretions were carbonate-rich and contained detrital fragments. Biomarker data showed that mudstone and concretions had very similar distributions and presented marine biosignatures including indicators of anoxic depositional conditions, a stratified water column, and photic zone euxinia. The concretions contained higher amounts of C27 steranes, indicating that more labile organic matter such as animal remains could have triggered concretion formation. Statistical analyses of the results showed that concretions and shales differed (p < 0.1) in indices diagnostic for lithologies (and often related to maturity), particularly in the sample recovered from the younger section of the core: the diasterane/sterane indices at each of the depths were 0.34 in the shale vs 0.12 in the concretion in the younger set of samples, and 0.21 vs 0.19 in the older set. The homohopane isomerisation indices of the mudstone and concretion were 0.66 vs 0.58 and 0.62 vs 0.60 (47 and 54 m depth, respectively). Furthermore, shales contained higher relative amounts of moretanes. Concretions also differed from the mudstone in their methylhopane distributions, with shales showing higher amounts of 3-methylhopanes. Conversely, when biomarker composition was compared at the two depths, they only differed significantly (p < 0.1) in the 2-methylhopane index,%C31 homohopanes, and hopane/sterane ratios (p < 0.1). Our results show that the biomarker composition of the mudstone at the time of deposition is largely preserved in the concretions with only a minor overprint from diagenesis, bacterial communities involved in concretion formation, or the organic matter nucleus. It is therefore possible to use biomarker analysis on carbonate concretions to determine their provenance if found outside their immediate geological context. NASA Astrobiology Institute (Award NNA13AA90A) 2020-10-02T19:07:10Z 2020-10-02T19:07:10Z 2017-08 2017-06 2019-06-10T14:22:10Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0146-6380 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/127799 Lengger, Sabine K. et al. "Mudstones and embedded concretions show differences in lithology-related, but not source-related biomarker distributions." Organic Geochemistry 113 (November 2017): 67-74 © 2017 Elsevier en http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2017.08.003 Organic Geochemistry Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ application/pdf Elsevier BV Prof. Summons via Chris Sherratt
spellingShingle Lengger, Sabine K.
Melendez, Ines M.
Summons, Roger E
Grice, Kliti
Mudstones and embedded concretions show differences in lithology-related, but not source-related biomarker distributions
title Mudstones and embedded concretions show differences in lithology-related, but not source-related biomarker distributions
title_full Mudstones and embedded concretions show differences in lithology-related, but not source-related biomarker distributions
title_fullStr Mudstones and embedded concretions show differences in lithology-related, but not source-related biomarker distributions
title_full_unstemmed Mudstones and embedded concretions show differences in lithology-related, but not source-related biomarker distributions
title_short Mudstones and embedded concretions show differences in lithology-related, but not source-related biomarker distributions
title_sort mudstones and embedded concretions show differences in lithology related but not source related biomarker distributions
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/127799
work_keys_str_mv AT lenggersabinek mudstonesandembeddedconcretionsshowdifferencesinlithologyrelatedbutnotsourcerelatedbiomarkerdistributions
AT melendezinesm mudstonesandembeddedconcretionsshowdifferencesinlithologyrelatedbutnotsourcerelatedbiomarkerdistributions
AT summonsrogere mudstonesandembeddedconcretionsshowdifferencesinlithologyrelatedbutnotsourcerelatedbiomarkerdistributions
AT gricekliti mudstonesandembeddedconcretionsshowdifferencesinlithologyrelatedbutnotsourcerelatedbiomarkerdistributions