Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements

Repetition increases the likelihood that a statement will be judged as true. This illusory truth effect is well established; however, it has been argued that repetition will not affect belief in unambiguous statements. When individuals are faced with obviously true or false statements, repetition sh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fazio, Lisa K., Rand, David Gertler, Pennycook, Gordon
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2020
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128421
_version_ 1811068704952156160
author Fazio, Lisa K.
Rand, David Gertler
Pennycook, Gordon
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Fazio, Lisa K.
Rand, David Gertler
Pennycook, Gordon
author_sort Fazio, Lisa K.
collection MIT
description Repetition increases the likelihood that a statement will be judged as true. This illusory truth effect is well established; however, it has been argued that repetition will not affect belief in unambiguous statements. When individuals are faced with obviously true or false statements, repetition should have no impact. We report a simulation study and a preregistered experiment that investigate this idea. Contrary to many intuitions, our results suggest that belief in all statements is increased by repetition. The observed illusory truth effect is largest for ambiguous items, but this can be explained by the psychometric properties of the task, rather than an underlying psychological mechanism that blocks the impact of repetition for implausible items. Our results indicate that the illusory truth effect is highly robust and occurs across all levels of plausibility. Therefore, even highly implausible statements will become more plausible with enough repetition.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T07:59:53Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/128421
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T07:59:53Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1284212024-06-25T20:21:09Z Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements Fazio, Lisa K. Rand, David Gertler Pennycook, Gordon Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society Repetition increases the likelihood that a statement will be judged as true. This illusory truth effect is well established; however, it has been argued that repetition will not affect belief in unambiguous statements. When individuals are faced with obviously true or false statements, repetition should have no impact. We report a simulation study and a preregistered experiment that investigate this idea. Contrary to many intuitions, our results suggest that belief in all statements is increased by repetition. The observed illusory truth effect is largest for ambiguous items, but this can be explained by the psychometric properties of the task, rather than an underlying psychological mechanism that blocks the impact of repetition for implausible items. Our results indicate that the illusory truth effect is highly robust and occurs across all levels of plausibility. Therefore, even highly implausible statements will become more plausible with enough repetition. 2020-11-06T21:38:12Z 2020-11-06T21:38:12Z 2019-08 2020-09-24T21:47:50Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1069-9384 1531-5320 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128421 Fazio, Lisa K. et al. "Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 26, 5 (October 2019): 1705–1710 © 2019 The Psychonomic Society, Inc. en http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01651-4 Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ The Psychonomic Society, Inc. application/pdf Springer Science and Business Media LLC Springer US
spellingShingle Fazio, Lisa K.
Rand, David Gertler
Pennycook, Gordon
Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements
title Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements
title_full Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements
title_fullStr Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements
title_full_unstemmed Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements
title_short Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements
title_sort repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128421
work_keys_str_mv AT faziolisak repetitionincreasesperceivedtruthequallyforplausibleandimplausiblestatements
AT randdavidgertler repetitionincreasesperceivedtruthequallyforplausibleandimplausiblestatements
AT pennycookgordon repetitionincreasesperceivedtruthequallyforplausibleandimplausiblestatements