Characterizing Fluid Response and Sepsis Progression in Emergency Department Patients

Sepsis and septic shock are major global public health concerns. The main therapies for sepsis-related hypotension are fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy, though it can be challenging to determine the amount of fluid that should be given or the optimal timing to transition to vasopressor ad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gu, Qiao, Prasad, Varesh, Heldt, Thomas
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Science
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 2020
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128879
_version_ 1826212131082600448
author Gu, Qiao
Prasad, Varesh
Heldt, Thomas
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Science
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Science
Gu, Qiao
Prasad, Varesh
Heldt, Thomas
author_sort Gu, Qiao
collection MIT
description Sepsis and septic shock are major global public health concerns. The main therapies for sepsis-related hypotension are fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy, though it can be challenging to determine the amount of fluid that should be given or the optimal timing to transition to vasopressor administration. To characterize patients' response to fluid bolus therapy (FBT) and analyze the sepsis progress using multiple vital signs, we mined a database containing 761 patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with vital signs and laboratory values indicating high risk of septic shock. By clustering the patients' mean arterial pressure (MAP) time series during a time window around FBT, we found that clusters showing fluid responsiveness during the two hours after FBT only included about 25% of studied boluses. In addition, MAP responses tended to vary based on the initial MAP level. We also found that the trajectories of heart rate and MAP in a 2-D plane demonstrated general trends related to the hemodynamic progression of sepsis and previously described phases of septic shock. Potentially compensatory and decompensatory responses of the cardiovascular system to the insults of sepsis were reflected in the clusters representative of different phases.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T15:16:52Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/128879
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T15:16:52Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1288792022-09-29T13:52:06Z Characterizing Fluid Response and Sepsis Progression in Emergency Department Patients Gu, Qiao Prasad, Varesh Heldt, Thomas Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Science Harvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Sepsis and septic shock are major global public health concerns. The main therapies for sepsis-related hypotension are fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy, though it can be challenging to determine the amount of fluid that should be given or the optimal timing to transition to vasopressor administration. To characterize patients' response to fluid bolus therapy (FBT) and analyze the sepsis progress using multiple vital signs, we mined a database containing 761 patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with vital signs and laboratory values indicating high risk of septic shock. By clustering the patients' mean arterial pressure (MAP) time series during a time window around FBT, we found that clusters showing fluid responsiveness during the two hours after FBT only included about 25% of studied boluses. In addition, MAP responses tended to vary based on the initial MAP level. We also found that the trajectories of heart rate and MAP in a 2-D plane demonstrated general trends related to the hemodynamic progression of sepsis and previously described phases of septic shock. Potentially compensatory and decompensatory responses of the cardiovascular system to the insults of sepsis were reflected in the clusters representative of different phases. 2020-12-21T19:02:03Z 2020-12-21T19:02:03Z 2019-10 2019-07 2020-12-17T18:23:23Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaper 9781538613115 1558-4615 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128879 Gu, Qiao et al. "Characterizing Fluid Response and Sepsis Progression in Emergency Department Patients." Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, July 2019, Berlin Germany, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, October 2019. © 2019 IEEE en http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/embc.2019.8856521 Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) MIT web domain
spellingShingle Gu, Qiao
Prasad, Varesh
Heldt, Thomas
Characterizing Fluid Response and Sepsis Progression in Emergency Department Patients
title Characterizing Fluid Response and Sepsis Progression in Emergency Department Patients
title_full Characterizing Fluid Response and Sepsis Progression in Emergency Department Patients
title_fullStr Characterizing Fluid Response and Sepsis Progression in Emergency Department Patients
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing Fluid Response and Sepsis Progression in Emergency Department Patients
title_short Characterizing Fluid Response and Sepsis Progression in Emergency Department Patients
title_sort characterizing fluid response and sepsis progression in emergency department patients
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128879
work_keys_str_mv AT guqiao characterizingfluidresponseandsepsisprogressioninemergencydepartmentpatients
AT prasadvaresh characterizingfluidresponseandsepsisprogressioninemergencydepartmentpatients
AT heldtthomas characterizingfluidresponseandsepsisprogressioninemergencydepartmentpatients