The Price of Anarchy: Centralized versus Distributed Resource Allocation Trade-offs

Optimizing decision quality in large scale, distributed, resource allocation problems requires selecting the appropriate decision network architecture. Such resource allocation problems occur in distributed sensor networks, military air campaign planning, logistics networks, energy grids, etc. Optim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guo, Jinhong, Karlovitz, Alexander, Jaillet, Patrick, Hofmann, Martin
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scitepress 2021
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128947
_version_ 1826216183390535680
author Guo, Jinhong
Karlovitz, Alexander
Jaillet, Patrick
Hofmann, Martin
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Guo, Jinhong
Karlovitz, Alexander
Jaillet, Patrick
Hofmann, Martin
author_sort Guo, Jinhong
collection MIT
description Optimizing decision quality in large scale, distributed, resource allocation problems requires selecting the appropriate decision network architecture. Such resource allocation problems occur in distributed sensor networks, military air campaign planning, logistics networks, energy grids, etc. Optimal solutions require that demand, resource status, and allocation decisions are shared via messaging between geographically distributed, independent decision nodes. Jamming of wireless links, cyber attacks against the network, or infrastructure damage from natural disasters interfere with messaging and, thus, the quality of the allocation decisions. Our contribution described in the paper is a decentralized resource allocation architecture and algorithm that is robust to significant message loss and to uncertain demand arrival, and provides fine-grained, many-to-many combinatorial task allocation. Most importantly, it enables a conscious choice of the best level of decentralization under the expected degree of communications denial and quantifies the benefits of approximating status of peer nodes using proxy agents during temporary communications loss.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T16:43:36Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/128947
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T16:43:36Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Scitepress
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1289472022-10-03T07:52:23Z The Price of Anarchy: Centralized versus Distributed Resource Allocation Trade-offs Guo, Jinhong Karlovitz, Alexander Jaillet, Patrick Hofmann, Martin Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Optimizing decision quality in large scale, distributed, resource allocation problems requires selecting the appropriate decision network architecture. Such resource allocation problems occur in distributed sensor networks, military air campaign planning, logistics networks, energy grids, etc. Optimal solutions require that demand, resource status, and allocation decisions are shared via messaging between geographically distributed, independent decision nodes. Jamming of wireless links, cyber attacks against the network, or infrastructure damage from natural disasters interfere with messaging and, thus, the quality of the allocation decisions. Our contribution described in the paper is a decentralized resource allocation architecture and algorithm that is robust to significant message loss and to uncertain demand arrival, and provides fine-grained, many-to-many combinatorial task allocation. Most importantly, it enables a conscious choice of the best level of decentralization under the expected degree of communications denial and quantifies the benefits of approximating status of peer nodes using proxy agents during temporary communications loss. ONR (Contract N00014-12-C-0162) 2021-01-04T21:07:16Z 2021-01-04T21:07:16Z 2019-02 2020-12-21T18:25:44Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaper 9789897583506 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128947 Guo, Jinhong et al. "The Price of Anarchy: Centralized versus Distributed Resource Allocation Trade-offs." Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, February 2019, Prague, Czech Republic, Scitepress, 2019. © 2019 Scitepress en http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0007345701460153 Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ application/pdf Scitepress SciTePress
spellingShingle Guo, Jinhong
Karlovitz, Alexander
Jaillet, Patrick
Hofmann, Martin
The Price of Anarchy: Centralized versus Distributed Resource Allocation Trade-offs
title The Price of Anarchy: Centralized versus Distributed Resource Allocation Trade-offs
title_full The Price of Anarchy: Centralized versus Distributed Resource Allocation Trade-offs
title_fullStr The Price of Anarchy: Centralized versus Distributed Resource Allocation Trade-offs
title_full_unstemmed The Price of Anarchy: Centralized versus Distributed Resource Allocation Trade-offs
title_short The Price of Anarchy: Centralized versus Distributed Resource Allocation Trade-offs
title_sort price of anarchy centralized versus distributed resource allocation trade offs
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128947
work_keys_str_mv AT guojinhong thepriceofanarchycentralizedversusdistributedresourceallocationtradeoffs
AT karlovitzalexander thepriceofanarchycentralizedversusdistributedresourceallocationtradeoffs
AT jailletpatrick thepriceofanarchycentralizedversusdistributedresourceallocationtradeoffs
AT hofmannmartin thepriceofanarchycentralizedversusdistributedresourceallocationtradeoffs
AT guojinhong priceofanarchycentralizedversusdistributedresourceallocationtradeoffs
AT karlovitzalexander priceofanarchycentralizedversusdistributedresourceallocationtradeoffs
AT jailletpatrick priceofanarchycentralizedversusdistributedresourceallocationtradeoffs
AT hofmannmartin priceofanarchycentralizedversusdistributedresourceallocationtradeoffs