Comparing Life Cycle Energy and Global Warming Potential of Carbon Fiber Composite Recycling Technologies and Waste Management Options
Carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) are used in increasing quantities as they have some of the best properties in terms of specific strength and stiffness of any widely available material. By 2020, annual global CFRP production is expected to be over 140,000 tonnes. However, the resulting increa...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2021
|
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/129482 |
_version_ | 1811086309609963520 |
---|---|
author | Meng, Fanran Olivetti, Elsa A. Zhao, Youyang Chang, Jiyoun Christina Pickering, Stephen J. McKechnie, Jon |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering Meng, Fanran Olivetti, Elsa A. Zhao, Youyang Chang, Jiyoun Christina Pickering, Stephen J. McKechnie, Jon |
author_sort | Meng, Fanran |
collection | MIT |
description | Carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) are used in increasing quantities as they have some of the best properties in terms of specific strength and stiffness of any widely available material. By 2020, annual global CFRP production is expected to be over 140,000 tonnes. However, the resulting increased quantity of CFRP waste has highlighted the need for sustainable treatment options as carbon fiber manufacture has high-energy intensity. A life cycle assessment methodology is used to evaluate primary energy demand (PED) and global warming potential (GWP) leveraging best available literature data, process models, and experimental work. Overall results indicate that recycling scenarios are generally the environmentally preferable options over landfill and incineration. However, the relative environmental benefits of advanced recycling processes (i.e., pyrolysis, fluidized bed, and chemical recycling process) depend on the method used to determine displacement of virgin carbon fiber by recycled carbon fiber. Totally, recycling processes can achieve a representative GWP from -19 to -27 kg CO2eq and PED from -395 to -520 MJ per kg CFRP, providing superior environmental performance to conventional composite waste treatment technologies. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T13:24:08Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/129482 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T13:24:08Z |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Chemical Society (ACS) |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/1294822022-09-28T13:56:15Z Comparing Life Cycle Energy and Global Warming Potential of Carbon Fiber Composite Recycling Technologies and Waste Management Options Meng, Fanran Olivetti, Elsa A. Zhao, Youyang Chang, Jiyoun Christina Pickering, Stephen J. McKechnie, Jon Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society Carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) are used in increasing quantities as they have some of the best properties in terms of specific strength and stiffness of any widely available material. By 2020, annual global CFRP production is expected to be over 140,000 tonnes. However, the resulting increased quantity of CFRP waste has highlighted the need for sustainable treatment options as carbon fiber manufacture has high-energy intensity. A life cycle assessment methodology is used to evaluate primary energy demand (PED) and global warming potential (GWP) leveraging best available literature data, process models, and experimental work. Overall results indicate that recycling scenarios are generally the environmentally preferable options over landfill and incineration. However, the relative environmental benefits of advanced recycling processes (i.e., pyrolysis, fluidized bed, and chemical recycling process) depend on the method used to determine displacement of virgin carbon fiber by recycled carbon fiber. Totally, recycling processes can achieve a representative GWP from -19 to -27 kg CO2eq and PED from -395 to -520 MJ per kg CFRP, providing superior environmental performance to conventional composite waste treatment technologies. 2021-01-20T20:06:24Z 2021-01-20T20:06:24Z 2018-06 2018-05 2019-09-23T13:41:38Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 2168-0485 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/129482 Meng, Fanran et al. "Comparing Life Cycle Energy and Global Warming Potential of Carbon Fiber Composite Recycling Technologies and Waste Management Options." ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 6, 8 (June 2018): 9854–9865 © 2018 American Chemical Society en http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01026 ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf American Chemical Society (ACS) ACS |
spellingShingle | Meng, Fanran Olivetti, Elsa A. Zhao, Youyang Chang, Jiyoun Christina Pickering, Stephen J. McKechnie, Jon Comparing Life Cycle Energy and Global Warming Potential of Carbon Fiber Composite Recycling Technologies and Waste Management Options |
title | Comparing Life Cycle Energy and Global Warming Potential of Carbon Fiber Composite Recycling Technologies and Waste Management Options |
title_full | Comparing Life Cycle Energy and Global Warming Potential of Carbon Fiber Composite Recycling Technologies and Waste Management Options |
title_fullStr | Comparing Life Cycle Energy and Global Warming Potential of Carbon Fiber Composite Recycling Technologies and Waste Management Options |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Life Cycle Energy and Global Warming Potential of Carbon Fiber Composite Recycling Technologies and Waste Management Options |
title_short | Comparing Life Cycle Energy and Global Warming Potential of Carbon Fiber Composite Recycling Technologies and Waste Management Options |
title_sort | comparing life cycle energy and global warming potential of carbon fiber composite recycling technologies and waste management options |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/129482 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mengfanran comparinglifecycleenergyandglobalwarmingpotentialofcarbonfibercompositerecyclingtechnologiesandwastemanagementoptions AT olivettielsaa comparinglifecycleenergyandglobalwarmingpotentialofcarbonfibercompositerecyclingtechnologiesandwastemanagementoptions AT zhaoyouyang comparinglifecycleenergyandglobalwarmingpotentialofcarbonfibercompositerecyclingtechnologiesandwastemanagementoptions AT changjiyounchristina comparinglifecycleenergyandglobalwarmingpotentialofcarbonfibercompositerecyclingtechnologiesandwastemanagementoptions AT pickeringstephenj comparinglifecycleenergyandglobalwarmingpotentialofcarbonfibercompositerecyclingtechnologiesandwastemanagementoptions AT mckechniejon comparinglifecycleenergyandglobalwarmingpotentialofcarbonfibercompositerecyclingtechnologiesandwastemanagementoptions |