Rational monism and rational pluralism
Consequentialists often assume rational monism: the thesis that options are always made rationally permissible by the maximization of the selfsame quantity. This essay argues that consequentialists should reject rational monism and instead accept rational pluralism: the thesis that, on different occ...
Main Author: | Spencer, Jack |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
2021
|
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130150 |
Similar Items
-
The rise of paradigmatic monism and its cultural implications
by: Abdul Murad, M.H.S.
Published: (2007) -
Evidence and rationalization
by: Wells, Ian
Published: (2021) -
Rational Groupthink
by: Harel, Matan, et al.
Published: (2021) -
The rationality of suicide
by: Chandrasekaran, Vaishgnavi
Published: (2018) -
Immoderately rational
by: Horowitz, Sophie
Published: (2016)