Response to Comment on “Adiabatic shear instability is not necessary for adhesion in cold spray”
In our original paper, Acta Materialia 158 (2018) 430–439, we showed that adiabatic shear instability is not necessary for impact-induced jetting and bonding to occur in cold spray. We also developed a mechanistic framework to estimate the critical velocity for jetting on the basis of a hydrodynamic...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Elsevier BV
2021
|
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130280 |
| _version_ | 1826206163078742016 |
|---|---|
| author | Hassani Gangaraj, Seyyed Mostafa Veysset, David Georges Champagne, Victor Nelson, Keith Adam Schuh, Christopher A |
| author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering |
| author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering Hassani Gangaraj, Seyyed Mostafa Veysset, David Georges Champagne, Victor Nelson, Keith Adam Schuh, Christopher A |
| author_sort | Hassani Gangaraj, Seyyed Mostafa |
| collection | MIT |
| description | In our original paper, Acta Materialia 158 (2018) 430–439, we showed that adiabatic shear instability is not necessary for impact-induced jetting and bonding to occur in cold spray. We also developed a mechanistic framework to estimate the critical velocity for jetting on the basis of a hydrodynamic spall process. In their comment, Scripta Materialia xx (2018) xx-xx, Assadi et al. raised several questions about the versatility of our framework in capturing cold spray-related physical phenomena. Here, we demonstrate that not only can our mechanistic framework explain cold spray physical phenomena such as particle size effects, strength effects and temperature effects, but also it can be used to quantify them. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-23T13:25:05Z |
| format | Article |
| id | mit-1721.1/130280 |
| institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-23T13:25:05Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Elsevier BV |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | mit-1721.1/1302802022-09-28T14:03:09Z Response to Comment on “Adiabatic shear instability is not necessary for adhesion in cold spray” Hassani Gangaraj, Seyyed Mostafa Veysset, David Georges Champagne, Victor Nelson, Keith Adam Schuh, Christopher A Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemistry Veysset, David In our original paper, Acta Materialia 158 (2018) 430–439, we showed that adiabatic shear instability is not necessary for impact-induced jetting and bonding to occur in cold spray. We also developed a mechanistic framework to estimate the critical velocity for jetting on the basis of a hydrodynamic spall process. In their comment, Scripta Materialia xx (2018) xx-xx, Assadi et al. raised several questions about the versatility of our framework in capturing cold spray-related physical phenomena. Here, we demonstrate that not only can our mechanistic framework explain cold spray physical phenomena such as particle size effects, strength effects and temperature effects, but also it can be used to quantify them. US Army Research Laboratory (Contract W911NF-15-2-0034) 2021-03-30T16:03:56Z 2021-03-30T16:03:56Z 2018-12 2018-12 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1359-6462 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130280 Hassani-Gangaraj, Mostafa et al. 'Response to Comment on “Adiabatic shear instability is not necessary for adhesion in cold spray”.' Scripta Materialia 162 (March 2019): 515-519. © 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.12.015 Scripta Materialia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ application/pdf Elsevier BV David Veysset |
| spellingShingle | Hassani Gangaraj, Seyyed Mostafa Veysset, David Georges Champagne, Victor Nelson, Keith Adam Schuh, Christopher A Response to Comment on “Adiabatic shear instability is not necessary for adhesion in cold spray” |
| title | Response to Comment on “Adiabatic shear instability is not necessary for adhesion in cold spray” |
| title_full | Response to Comment on “Adiabatic shear instability is not necessary for adhesion in cold spray” |
| title_fullStr | Response to Comment on “Adiabatic shear instability is not necessary for adhesion in cold spray” |
| title_full_unstemmed | Response to Comment on “Adiabatic shear instability is not necessary for adhesion in cold spray” |
| title_short | Response to Comment on “Adiabatic shear instability is not necessary for adhesion in cold spray” |
| title_sort | response to comment on adiabatic shear instability is not necessary for adhesion in cold spray |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130280 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hassanigangarajseyyedmostafa responsetocommentonadiabaticshearinstabilityisnotnecessaryforadhesionincoldspray AT veyssetdavidgeorges responsetocommentonadiabaticshearinstabilityisnotnecessaryforadhesionincoldspray AT champagnevictor responsetocommentonadiabaticshearinstabilityisnotnecessaryforadhesionincoldspray AT nelsonkeithadam responsetocommentonadiabaticshearinstabilityisnotnecessaryforadhesionincoldspray AT schuhchristophera responsetocommentonadiabaticshearinstabilityisnotnecessaryforadhesionincoldspray |