Different Physical Intuitions Exist Between Tasks, Not Domains

Abstract Does human behavior exploit deep and accurate knowledge about how the world works, or does it rely on shallow and often inaccurate heuristics? This fundamental question is rooted in a classic dichotomy in psychology: human intuitions about even simple scenarios can be poor, y...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Smith, Kevin A, Battaglia, Peter W, Vul, Edward
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer International Publishing 2021
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/131487
_version_ 1826215005592223744
author Smith, Kevin A
Battaglia, Peter W
Vul, Edward
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Smith, Kevin A
Battaglia, Peter W
Vul, Edward
author_sort Smith, Kevin A
collection MIT
description Abstract Does human behavior exploit deep and accurate knowledge about how the world works, or does it rely on shallow and often inaccurate heuristics? This fundamental question is rooted in a classic dichotomy in psychology: human intuitions about even simple scenarios can be poor, yet their behaviors can exceed the capabilities of even the most advanced machines. One domain where such a dichotomy has classically been demonstrated is intuitive physics. Here we demonstrate that this dichotomy is rooted in how physical knowledge is measured: extrapolation of ballistic motion is idiosyncratic and erroneous when people draw the trajectories but consistent with accurate physical inferences under uncertainty when people use the same trajectories to catch a ball or release it to hit a target. Our results suggest that the contrast between rich and calibrated versus poor and inaccurate patterns of physical reasoning exists as a result of using different systems of knowledge across tasks, rather than being driven solely by a universal system of knowledge that is inconsistent across physical principles.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T16:15:00Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/131487
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T16:15:00Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1314872023-01-11T20:03:44Z Different Physical Intuitions Exist Between Tasks, Not Domains Smith, Kevin A Battaglia, Peter W Vul, Edward Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Abstract Does human behavior exploit deep and accurate knowledge about how the world works, or does it rely on shallow and often inaccurate heuristics? This fundamental question is rooted in a classic dichotomy in psychology: human intuitions about even simple scenarios can be poor, yet their behaviors can exceed the capabilities of even the most advanced machines. One domain where such a dichotomy has classically been demonstrated is intuitive physics. Here we demonstrate that this dichotomy is rooted in how physical knowledge is measured: extrapolation of ballistic motion is idiosyncratic and erroneous when people draw the trajectories but consistent with accurate physical inferences under uncertainty when people use the same trajectories to catch a ball or release it to hit a target. Our results suggest that the contrast between rich and calibrated versus poor and inaccurate patterns of physical reasoning exists as a result of using different systems of knowledge across tasks, rather than being driven solely by a universal system of knowledge that is inconsistent across physical principles. 2021-09-20T17:17:17Z 2021-09-20T17:17:17Z 2018-07-09 2020-09-24T21:19:48Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/131487 en https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-018-0007-3 Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. Springer International Publishing application/pdf Springer International Publishing Springer International Publishing
spellingShingle Smith, Kevin A
Battaglia, Peter W
Vul, Edward
Different Physical Intuitions Exist Between Tasks, Not Domains
title Different Physical Intuitions Exist Between Tasks, Not Domains
title_full Different Physical Intuitions Exist Between Tasks, Not Domains
title_fullStr Different Physical Intuitions Exist Between Tasks, Not Domains
title_full_unstemmed Different Physical Intuitions Exist Between Tasks, Not Domains
title_short Different Physical Intuitions Exist Between Tasks, Not Domains
title_sort different physical intuitions exist between tasks not domains
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/131487
work_keys_str_mv AT smithkevina differentphysicalintuitionsexistbetweentasksnotdomains
AT battagliapeterw differentphysicalintuitionsexistbetweentasksnotdomains
AT vuledward differentphysicalintuitionsexistbetweentasksnotdomains