Evidence and rationalization

Abstract Suppose that you have to take a test tomorrow but you do not want to study. Unfortunately you should study, since you care about passing and you expect to pass only if you study. Is there anything you can do to make it the case that you should not study? Is there any way for you to ‘ration...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wells, Ian
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Netherlands 2021
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/131780
_version_ 1826209067788402688
author Wells, Ian
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Wells, Ian
author_sort Wells, Ian
collection MIT
description Abstract Suppose that you have to take a test tomorrow but you do not want to study. Unfortunately you should study, since you care about passing and you expect to pass only if you study. Is there anything you can do to make it the case that you should not study? Is there any way for you to ‘rationalize’ slacking off? I suggest that such rationalization is impossible. Then I show that if evidential decision theory is true, rationalization is not only possible but sometimes advisable.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:17:03Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/131780
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:17:03Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1317802023-03-15T17:54:15Z Evidence and rationalization Wells, Ian Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy Abstract Suppose that you have to take a test tomorrow but you do not want to study. Unfortunately you should study, since you care about passing and you expect to pass only if you study. Is there anything you can do to make it the case that you should not study? Is there any way for you to ‘rationalize’ slacking off? I suggest that such rationalization is impossible. Then I show that if evidential decision theory is true, rationalization is not only possible but sometimes advisable. 2021-09-20T17:30:14Z 2021-09-20T17:30:14Z 2018-12-11 2020-09-24T20:38:15Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/131780 en https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1209-1 Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. Springer Nature B.V. application/pdf Springer Netherlands Springer Netherlands
spellingShingle Wells, Ian
Evidence and rationalization
title Evidence and rationalization
title_full Evidence and rationalization
title_fullStr Evidence and rationalization
title_full_unstemmed Evidence and rationalization
title_short Evidence and rationalization
title_sort evidence and rationalization
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/131780
work_keys_str_mv AT wellsian evidenceandrationalization