Auditory-Tactile integration: Effects of Phase of Sinusoidal Stimulation at 50 and 250 Hz.

The perceptual integration of 50- and 250-Hz, 500-ms vibrotactile and auditory tones was studied in detection experiments as a function of the relative phase (0°, 72°, 144°, 216°, and 288°) of the tone pulses. Vibrotactile stimuli were delivered through a single-channel vibrator to the left middle f...

Повний опис

Бібліографічні деталі
Автори: Ranjbar, Parivash, Wilson, E Courtenay, Reed, Charlotte M., Braida, Louis D
Інші автори: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: 2021
Онлайн доступ:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133008
_version_ 1826202028673597440
author Ranjbar, Parivash
Wilson, E Courtenay
Reed, Charlotte M.
Braida, Louis D
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics
Ranjbar, Parivash
Wilson, E Courtenay
Reed, Charlotte M.
Braida, Louis D
author_sort Ranjbar, Parivash
collection MIT
description The perceptual integration of 50- and 250-Hz, 500-ms vibrotactile and auditory tones was studied in detection experiments as a function of the relative phase (0°, 72°, 144°, 216°, and 288°) of the tone pulses. Vibrotactile stimuli were delivered through a single-channel vibrator to the left middle fingertip and auditory stimuli were presented diotically through headphones in a background of 50 dB SPL broadband noise. The observers were four adults with normal hearing. The vibrotactile and auditory stimulus levels used each yielded 63-77%-Correct unimodal detection performance in a two-interval two-alternative forced-choice task. Scores for the auditory-alone and tactile-alone conditions averaged roughly 70%-Correct. Mean scores for the auditory plus tactile conditions averaged across different phases were 77.1%-Correct at 50 Hz and 79.6%-Correct at 250 Hz. At 50 Hz, no differences in performance were observed as a function of the relative phase at which the combined auditory and tactile signals were presented. At 250 Hz, significantly higher scores were observed for one phase combination (72°) compared to two of the other four relative phases. Performance on the auditory plus tactile conditions resulted in significant integrative effects and was generally more consistent with a "Pythagorean Sum" model than with either an "Algebraic Sum" or an "Optimum Single Cannel" model of perceptual integration.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T12:01:04Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/133008
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T12:01:04Z
publishDate 2021
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1330082022-10-01T07:38:16Z Auditory-Tactile integration: Effects of Phase of Sinusoidal Stimulation at 50 and 250 Hz. Ranjbar, Parivash Wilson, E Courtenay Reed, Charlotte M. Braida, Louis D Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics The perceptual integration of 50- and 250-Hz, 500-ms vibrotactile and auditory tones was studied in detection experiments as a function of the relative phase (0°, 72°, 144°, 216°, and 288°) of the tone pulses. Vibrotactile stimuli were delivered through a single-channel vibrator to the left middle fingertip and auditory stimuli were presented diotically through headphones in a background of 50 dB SPL broadband noise. The observers were four adults with normal hearing. The vibrotactile and auditory stimulus levels used each yielded 63-77%-Correct unimodal detection performance in a two-interval two-alternative forced-choice task. Scores for the auditory-alone and tactile-alone conditions averaged roughly 70%-Correct. Mean scores for the auditory plus tactile conditions averaged across different phases were 77.1%-Correct at 50 Hz and 79.6%-Correct at 250 Hz. At 50 Hz, no differences in performance were observed as a function of the relative phase at which the combined auditory and tactile signals were presented. At 250 Hz, significantly higher scores were observed for one phase combination (72°) compared to two of the other four relative phases. Performance on the auditory plus tactile conditions resulted in significant integrative effects and was generally more consistent with a "Pythagorean Sum" model than with either an "Algebraic Sum" or an "Optimum Single Cannel" model of perceptual integration. National Institutes of Health (Grant R01-DC00117) 2021-10-15T19:33:07Z 2021-10-15T19:33:07Z 2016-04 2019-05-10T15:39:05Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133008 Ranjbar, Parivash, Wilson, E Courtenay, Reed, Charlotte M. and Braida, Louis D. 2016. "Auditory-Tactile integration: Effects of Phase of Sinusoidal Stimulation at 50 and 250 Hz.." Int J Eng Technol Sci Innov, 1 (2). en https://www.ijetsi.org/more.php?id=18 Int J Eng Technol Sci Innov Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf PMC
spellingShingle Ranjbar, Parivash
Wilson, E Courtenay
Reed, Charlotte M.
Braida, Louis D
Auditory-Tactile integration: Effects of Phase of Sinusoidal Stimulation at 50 and 250 Hz.
title Auditory-Tactile integration: Effects of Phase of Sinusoidal Stimulation at 50 and 250 Hz.
title_full Auditory-Tactile integration: Effects of Phase of Sinusoidal Stimulation at 50 and 250 Hz.
title_fullStr Auditory-Tactile integration: Effects of Phase of Sinusoidal Stimulation at 50 and 250 Hz.
title_full_unstemmed Auditory-Tactile integration: Effects of Phase of Sinusoidal Stimulation at 50 and 250 Hz.
title_short Auditory-Tactile integration: Effects of Phase of Sinusoidal Stimulation at 50 and 250 Hz.
title_sort auditory tactile integration effects of phase of sinusoidal stimulation at 50 and 250 hz
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133008
work_keys_str_mv AT ranjbarparivash auditorytactileintegrationeffectsofphaseofsinusoidalstimulationat50and250hz
AT wilsonecourtenay auditorytactileintegrationeffectsofphaseofsinusoidalstimulationat50and250hz
AT reedcharlottem auditorytactileintegrationeffectsofphaseofsinusoidalstimulationat50and250hz
AT braidalouisd auditorytactileintegrationeffectsofphaseofsinusoidalstimulationat50and250hz