Timing matters when correcting fake news

© 2021 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Countering misinformation can reduce belief in the moment, but corrective messages quickly fade from memory. We tested whether the longer-term impact of fact-checks depends on when people receive them. In two experiments (total N = 2,683), pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brashier, Nadia M., Pennycook, Gordon, Berinsky, Adam, Rand, David Gertler
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2021
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133011
_version_ 1826216757698756608
author Brashier, Nadia M.
Pennycook, Gordon
Berinsky, Adam
Rand, David Gertler
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
Brashier, Nadia M.
Pennycook, Gordon
Berinsky, Adam
Rand, David Gertler
author_sort Brashier, Nadia M.
collection MIT
description © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Countering misinformation can reduce belief in the moment, but corrective messages quickly fade from memory. We tested whether the longer-term impact of fact-checks depends on when people receive them. In two experiments (total N = 2,683), participants read true and false headlines taken from social media. In the treatment conditions, “true” and “false” tags appeared before, during, or after participants read each headline. Participants in a control condition received no information about veracity. One week later, participants in all conditions rated the same headlines’ accuracy. Providing fact-checks after headlines (debunking) improved subsequent truth discernment more than providing the same information during (labeling) or before (prebunking) exposure. This finding informs the cognitive science of belief revision and has practical implications for social media platform designers.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T16:52:38Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/133011
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T16:52:38Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1330112021-10-27T20:00:43Z Timing matters when correcting fake news Brashier, Nadia M. Pennycook, Gordon Berinsky, Adam Rand, David Gertler Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science Sloan School of Management. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Countering misinformation can reduce belief in the moment, but corrective messages quickly fade from memory. We tested whether the longer-term impact of fact-checks depends on when people receive them. In two experiments (total N = 2,683), participants read true and false headlines taken from social media. In the treatment conditions, “true” and “false” tags appeared before, during, or after participants read each headline. Participants in a control condition received no information about veracity. One week later, participants in all conditions rated the same headlines’ accuracy. Providing fact-checks after headlines (debunking) improved subsequent truth discernment more than providing the same information during (labeling) or before (prebunking) exposure. This finding informs the cognitive science of belief revision and has practical implications for social media platform designers. 2021-10-15T20:01:54Z 2021-10-15T20:01:54Z 2021-01 2021-03-12T14:52:25Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0027-8424 1091-6490 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133011 Brashier, Nadia M., Pennycook, Gordon, Berinsky, Adam and Rand, David Gertler. 2021. "Timing matters when correcting fake news." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118 (5). en http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2020043118 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences PNAS
spellingShingle Brashier, Nadia M.
Pennycook, Gordon
Berinsky, Adam
Rand, David Gertler
Timing matters when correcting fake news
title Timing matters when correcting fake news
title_full Timing matters when correcting fake news
title_fullStr Timing matters when correcting fake news
title_full_unstemmed Timing matters when correcting fake news
title_short Timing matters when correcting fake news
title_sort timing matters when correcting fake news
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133011
work_keys_str_mv AT brashiernadiam timingmatterswhencorrectingfakenews
AT pennycookgordon timingmatterswhencorrectingfakenews
AT berinskyadam timingmatterswhencorrectingfakenews
AT randdavidgertler timingmatterswhencorrectingfakenews