Timing matters when correcting fake news
© 2021 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Countering misinformation can reduce belief in the moment, but corrective messages quickly fade from memory. We tested whether the longer-term impact of fact-checks depends on when people receive them. In two experiments (total N = 2,683), pa...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2021
|
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133011 |
_version_ | 1826216757698756608 |
---|---|
author | Brashier, Nadia M. Pennycook, Gordon Berinsky, Adam Rand, David Gertler |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science Brashier, Nadia M. Pennycook, Gordon Berinsky, Adam Rand, David Gertler |
author_sort | Brashier, Nadia M. |
collection | MIT |
description | © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Countering misinformation can reduce belief in the moment, but corrective messages quickly fade from memory. We tested whether the longer-term impact of fact-checks depends on when people receive them. In two experiments (total N = 2,683), participants read true and false headlines taken from social media. In the treatment conditions, “true” and “false” tags appeared before, during, or after participants read each headline. Participants in a control condition received no information about veracity. One week later, participants in all conditions rated the same headlines’ accuracy. Providing fact-checks after headlines (debunking) improved subsequent truth discernment more than providing the same information during (labeling) or before (prebunking) exposure. This finding informs the cognitive science of belief revision and has practical implications for social media platform designers. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T16:52:38Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/133011 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T16:52:38Z |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/1330112021-10-27T20:00:43Z Timing matters when correcting fake news Brashier, Nadia M. Pennycook, Gordon Berinsky, Adam Rand, David Gertler Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science Sloan School of Management. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Countering misinformation can reduce belief in the moment, but corrective messages quickly fade from memory. We tested whether the longer-term impact of fact-checks depends on when people receive them. In two experiments (total N = 2,683), participants read true and false headlines taken from social media. In the treatment conditions, “true” and “false” tags appeared before, during, or after participants read each headline. Participants in a control condition received no information about veracity. One week later, participants in all conditions rated the same headlines’ accuracy. Providing fact-checks after headlines (debunking) improved subsequent truth discernment more than providing the same information during (labeling) or before (prebunking) exposure. This finding informs the cognitive science of belief revision and has practical implications for social media platform designers. 2021-10-15T20:01:54Z 2021-10-15T20:01:54Z 2021-01 2021-03-12T14:52:25Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0027-8424 1091-6490 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133011 Brashier, Nadia M., Pennycook, Gordon, Berinsky, Adam and Rand, David Gertler. 2021. "Timing matters when correcting fake news." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118 (5). en http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2020043118 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. application/pdf Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences PNAS |
spellingShingle | Brashier, Nadia M. Pennycook, Gordon Berinsky, Adam Rand, David Gertler Timing matters when correcting fake news |
title | Timing matters when correcting fake news |
title_full | Timing matters when correcting fake news |
title_fullStr | Timing matters when correcting fake news |
title_full_unstemmed | Timing matters when correcting fake news |
title_short | Timing matters when correcting fake news |
title_sort | timing matters when correcting fake news |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brashiernadiam timingmatterswhencorrectingfakenews AT pennycookgordon timingmatterswhencorrectingfakenews AT berinskyadam timingmatterswhencorrectingfakenews AT randdavidgertler timingmatterswhencorrectingfakenews |