Invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Four experiments examine how lack of awareness of inequality affect behaviour towards the rich and poor. In Experiment 1, participants who became aware that wealthy individuals donated a smaller percentage of their income switched from rewar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: HAUSER, OLIVER P, KRAFT-TODD, GORDON T, RAND, DAVID G, NOWAK, MARTIN A, NORTON, MICHAEL I
Other Authors: Sloan School of Management
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2021
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133343
_version_ 1826194234723532800
author HAUSER, OLIVER P
KRAFT-TODD, GORDON T
RAND, DAVID G
NOWAK, MARTIN A
NORTON, MICHAEL I
author2 Sloan School of Management
author_facet Sloan School of Management
HAUSER, OLIVER P
KRAFT-TODD, GORDON T
RAND, DAVID G
NOWAK, MARTIN A
NORTON, MICHAEL I
author_sort HAUSER, OLIVER P
collection MIT
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Four experiments examine how lack of awareness of inequality affect behaviour towards the rich and poor. In Experiment 1, participants who became aware that wealthy individuals donated a smaller percentage of their income switched from rewarding the wealthy to rewarding the poor. In Experiments 2 and 3, participants who played a public goods game – and were assigned incomes reflective of the US income distribution either at random or on merit – punished the poor (for small absolute contributions) and rewarded the rich (for large absolute contributions) when incomes were unknown; when incomes were revealed, participants punished the rich (for their low percentage of income contributed) and rewarded the poor (for their high percentage of income contributed). In Experiment 4, participants provided with public education contributions for five New York school districts levied additional taxes on mostly poorer school districts when incomes were unknown, but targeted wealthier districts when incomes were revealed. These results shed light on how income transparency shapes preferences for equity and redistribution. We discuss implications for policy-makers.</jats:p>
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:52:59Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/133343
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:52:59Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1333432023-12-22T21:02:32Z Invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich HAUSER, OLIVER P KRAFT-TODD, GORDON T RAND, DAVID G NOWAK, MARTIN A NORTON, MICHAEL I Sloan School of Management <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Four experiments examine how lack of awareness of inequality affect behaviour towards the rich and poor. In Experiment 1, participants who became aware that wealthy individuals donated a smaller percentage of their income switched from rewarding the wealthy to rewarding the poor. In Experiments 2 and 3, participants who played a public goods game – and were assigned incomes reflective of the US income distribution either at random or on merit – punished the poor (for small absolute contributions) and rewarded the rich (for large absolute contributions) when incomes were unknown; when incomes were revealed, participants punished the rich (for their low percentage of income contributed) and rewarded the poor (for their high percentage of income contributed). In Experiment 4, participants provided with public education contributions for five New York school districts levied additional taxes on mostly poorer school districts when incomes were unknown, but targeted wealthier districts when incomes were revealed. These results shed light on how income transparency shapes preferences for equity and redistribution. We discuss implications for policy-makers.</jats:p> 2021-10-27T19:52:14Z 2021-10-27T19:52:14Z 2019 2021-04-14T13:58:58Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133343 en 10.1017/BPP.2019.4 Behavioural Public Policy Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf Cambridge University Press (CUP) SSRN
spellingShingle HAUSER, OLIVER P
KRAFT-TODD, GORDON T
RAND, DAVID G
NOWAK, MARTIN A
NORTON, MICHAEL I
Invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich
title Invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich
title_full Invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich
title_fullStr Invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich
title_full_unstemmed Invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich
title_short Invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich
title_sort invisible inequality leads to punishing the poor and rewarding the rich
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133343
work_keys_str_mv AT hauseroliverp invisibleinequalityleadstopunishingthepoorandrewardingtherich
AT krafttoddgordont invisibleinequalityleadstopunishingthepoorandrewardingtherich
AT randdavidg invisibleinequalityleadstopunishingthepoorandrewardingtherich
AT nowakmartina invisibleinequalityleadstopunishingthepoorandrewardingtherich
AT nortonmichaeli invisibleinequalityleadstopunishingthepoorandrewardingtherich