On the relevance of turbulent structures resolution for cross-flow in a helical-coil tube bundle

© 2020 Elsevier Ltd Helical-coil steam generators are being adopted in a number of advanced nuclear reactor designs because of their increased heat transfer efficiency and compactness. Due to the limited operational experience and the expected high cost of dedicated experiments, it is imperative to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Feng, Jinyong, Acton, Michael, Baglietto, Emilio, Kraus, Adam R, Merzari, Elia
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier BV 2021
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133401
_version_ 1826201685897248768
author Feng, Jinyong
Acton, Michael
Baglietto, Emilio
Kraus, Adam R
Merzari, Elia
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering
Feng, Jinyong
Acton, Michael
Baglietto, Emilio
Kraus, Adam R
Merzari, Elia
author_sort Feng, Jinyong
collection MIT
description © 2020 Elsevier Ltd Helical-coil steam generators are being adopted in a number of advanced nuclear reactor designs because of their increased heat transfer efficiency and compactness. Due to the limited operational experience and the expected high cost of dedicated experiments, it is imperative to demonstrate the modeling capability. Computational fluid dynamics is ideally suited for this problem, due to its high resolution and accuracy. However, traditional low-cost URANS turbulence models have shown limited applicability for cross-flow in helical tube bundles. On the other hand, LES methods provide high-accuracy and high-fidelity data with prohibitively high computational cost for design use. In this work, the recently proposed hybrid second-generation model STRUCT is compared to classic URANS turbulence formulations against high-fidelity LES simulations. The STRUCT model produces accurate predictions for all relevant quantities, demonstrating high potential for reproducing helical-coil tube bundle flow phenomena accurately, at an affordable computational cost.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:55:25Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/133401
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T11:55:25Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier BV
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1334012023-02-24T17:06:36Z On the relevance of turbulent structures resolution for cross-flow in a helical-coil tube bundle Feng, Jinyong Acton, Michael Baglietto, Emilio Kraus, Adam R Merzari, Elia Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering © 2020 Elsevier Ltd Helical-coil steam generators are being adopted in a number of advanced nuclear reactor designs because of their increased heat transfer efficiency and compactness. Due to the limited operational experience and the expected high cost of dedicated experiments, it is imperative to demonstrate the modeling capability. Computational fluid dynamics is ideally suited for this problem, due to its high resolution and accuracy. However, traditional low-cost URANS turbulence models have shown limited applicability for cross-flow in helical tube bundles. On the other hand, LES methods provide high-accuracy and high-fidelity data with prohibitively high computational cost for design use. In this work, the recently proposed hybrid second-generation model STRUCT is compared to classic URANS turbulence formulations against high-fidelity LES simulations. The STRUCT model produces accurate predictions for all relevant quantities, demonstrating high potential for reproducing helical-coil tube bundle flow phenomena accurately, at an affordable computational cost. 2021-10-27T19:52:38Z 2021-10-27T19:52:38Z 2020 2021-08-10T14:16:45Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133401 en 10.1016/J.ANUCENE.2019.107298 Annals of Nuclear Energy Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ application/pdf Elsevier BV DOE repository
spellingShingle Feng, Jinyong
Acton, Michael
Baglietto, Emilio
Kraus, Adam R
Merzari, Elia
On the relevance of turbulent structures resolution for cross-flow in a helical-coil tube bundle
title On the relevance of turbulent structures resolution for cross-flow in a helical-coil tube bundle
title_full On the relevance of turbulent structures resolution for cross-flow in a helical-coil tube bundle
title_fullStr On the relevance of turbulent structures resolution for cross-flow in a helical-coil tube bundle
title_full_unstemmed On the relevance of turbulent structures resolution for cross-flow in a helical-coil tube bundle
title_short On the relevance of turbulent structures resolution for cross-flow in a helical-coil tube bundle
title_sort on the relevance of turbulent structures resolution for cross flow in a helical coil tube bundle
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133401
work_keys_str_mv AT fengjinyong ontherelevanceofturbulentstructuresresolutionforcrossflowinahelicalcoiltubebundle
AT actonmichael ontherelevanceofturbulentstructuresresolutionforcrossflowinahelicalcoiltubebundle
AT bagliettoemilio ontherelevanceofturbulentstructuresresolutionforcrossflowinahelicalcoiltubebundle
AT krausadamr ontherelevanceofturbulentstructuresresolutionforcrossflowinahelicalcoiltubebundle
AT merzarielia ontherelevanceofturbulentstructuresresolutionforcrossflowinahelicalcoiltubebundle