Cheaters, Liars, or Both? A New Classification of Dishonesty Profiles
© The Author(s) 2020. Experimental studies of dishonesty usually rely on population-level analyses, which compare the distribution of claimed rewards in an unsupervised, self-administered lottery (e.g., tossing a coin) with the expected lottery statistics (e.g., 50/50 chance of winning). Here, we pr...
Main Authors: | Pascual-Ezama, David, Prelec, Drazen, Muñoz, Adrián, Gil-Gómez de Liaño, Beatriz |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Sloan School of Management |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/133974 |
Similar Items
-
Peer Effects in Unethical Behavior: Standing or Reputation?
by: Pascual-Ezama, David, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Do Not Tell Me More; You Are Honest: A Preconceived Honesty Bias
by: Pascual-Ezama, David, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Working memory effects in speeded RSVP tasks
by: Gil-Gómez de Liaño, Beatriz, et al.
Published: (2016) -
DISHONESTY AND THE HANDICAP PRINCIPLE
by: Johnstone, R, et al.
Published: (1993) -
An experiment on excuses for dishonesty
by: Choo, Jun Xian, et al.
Published: (2023)