Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields

© 2019, The Author(s). The ratio of syringyl (S) and guaiacyl (G) units in lignin has been regarded as a major factor in determining the maximum monomer yield from lignin depolymerization. This limit arises from the notion that G units are prone to C-C bond formation during lignin biosynthesis, resu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anderson, Eric M, Stone, Michael L, Katahira, Rui, Reed, Michelle, Muchero, Wellington, Ramirez, Kelsey J, Beckham, Gregg T, Román-Leshkov, Yuriy
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2021
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/134626
_version_ 1826199305854124032
author Anderson, Eric M
Stone, Michael L
Katahira, Rui
Reed, Michelle
Muchero, Wellington
Ramirez, Kelsey J
Beckham, Gregg T
Román-Leshkov, Yuriy
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
Anderson, Eric M
Stone, Michael L
Katahira, Rui
Reed, Michelle
Muchero, Wellington
Ramirez, Kelsey J
Beckham, Gregg T
Román-Leshkov, Yuriy
author_sort Anderson, Eric M
collection MIT
description © 2019, The Author(s). The ratio of syringyl (S) and guaiacyl (G) units in lignin has been regarded as a major factor in determining the maximum monomer yield from lignin depolymerization. This limit arises from the notion that G units are prone to C-C bond formation during lignin biosynthesis, resulting in less ether linkages that generate monomers. This study uses reductive catalytic fractionation (RCF) in flow-through reactors as an analytical tool to depolymerize lignin in poplar with naturally varying S/G ratios, and directly challenges the common conception that the S/G ratio predicts monomer yields. Rather, this work suggests that the plant controls C-O and C-C bond content by regulating monomer transport during lignin biosynthesis. Overall, our results indicate that additional factors beyond the monomeric composition of native lignin are important in developing a fundamental understanding of lignin biosynthesis.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:17:38Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/134626
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T11:17:38Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1346262023-09-27T19:47:49Z Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields Anderson, Eric M Stone, Michael L Katahira, Rui Reed, Michelle Muchero, Wellington Ramirez, Kelsey J Beckham, Gregg T Román-Leshkov, Yuriy Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering © 2019, The Author(s). The ratio of syringyl (S) and guaiacyl (G) units in lignin has been regarded as a major factor in determining the maximum monomer yield from lignin depolymerization. This limit arises from the notion that G units are prone to C-C bond formation during lignin biosynthesis, resulting in less ether linkages that generate monomers. This study uses reductive catalytic fractionation (RCF) in flow-through reactors as an analytical tool to depolymerize lignin in poplar with naturally varying S/G ratios, and directly challenges the common conception that the S/G ratio predicts monomer yields. Rather, this work suggests that the plant controls C-O and C-C bond content by regulating monomer transport during lignin biosynthesis. Overall, our results indicate that additional factors beyond the monomeric composition of native lignin are important in developing a fundamental understanding of lignin biosynthesis. 2021-10-27T20:05:51Z 2021-10-27T20:05:51Z 2019 2019-09-11T13:18:04Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/134626 en 10.1038/s41467-019-09986-1 Nature Communications Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf Springer Science and Business Media LLC Nature
spellingShingle Anderson, Eric M
Stone, Michael L
Katahira, Rui
Reed, Michelle
Muchero, Wellington
Ramirez, Kelsey J
Beckham, Gregg T
Román-Leshkov, Yuriy
Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields
title Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields
title_full Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields
title_fullStr Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields
title_full_unstemmed Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields
title_short Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields
title_sort differences in s g ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/134626
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonericm differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields
AT stonemichaell differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields
AT katahirarui differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields
AT reedmichelle differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields
AT mucherowellington differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields
AT ramirezkelseyj differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields
AT beckhamgreggt differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields
AT romanleshkovyuriy differencesinsgratioinnaturalpoplarvariantsdonotpredictcatalyticdepolymerizationmonomeryields