Operando NAP-XPS unveils differences in MoO3 and Mo2C during hydrodeoxygenation

© 2018, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited. MoO3 and Mo2C have emerged as remarkable catalysts for the selective hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) of a wide range of oxygenates at low temperatures (that is, ≤673 K) and H2 pressures (that is, ≤1 bar). Although both catalysts can...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Murugappan, Karthick, Anderson, Eric M, Teschner, Detre, Jones, Travis E, Skorupska, Katarzyna, Román-Leshkov, Yuriy
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2021
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/135080
_version_ 1826204856127324160
author Murugappan, Karthick
Anderson, Eric M
Teschner, Detre
Jones, Travis E
Skorupska, Katarzyna
Román-Leshkov, Yuriy
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering
Murugappan, Karthick
Anderson, Eric M
Teschner, Detre
Jones, Travis E
Skorupska, Katarzyna
Román-Leshkov, Yuriy
author_sort Murugappan, Karthick
collection MIT
description © 2018, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited. MoO3 and Mo2C have emerged as remarkable catalysts for the selective hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) of a wide range of oxygenates at low temperatures (that is, ≤673 K) and H2 pressures (that is, ≤1 bar). Although both catalysts can selectively cleave C–O bonds, the nature of their active sites remains unclear. Here we used operando near-ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to reveal important differences in the Mo 3d oxidation states between the two catalysts during the hydrodeoxygenation of anisole. This technique revealed that, although both catalysts featured a surface oxycarbidic phase, the oxygen content and the underlying phase of the material impacted the reactivity and product selectivity during the hydrodeoxygenation. MoO3 transitioned between 5+ and 6+ oxidation states during the operation, consistent with an oxygen-vacancy driven mechanism wherein the oxygenate is activated at undercoordinated Mo sites. In contrast, Mo2C showed negligible oxidation state changes during hydrodeoxygenation and maintained mostly 2+ states throughout the reaction.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T13:02:28Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/135080
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T13:02:28Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1350802023-09-12T20:08:43Z Operando NAP-XPS unveils differences in MoO3 and Mo2C during hydrodeoxygenation Murugappan, Karthick Anderson, Eric M Teschner, Detre Jones, Travis E Skorupska, Katarzyna Román-Leshkov, Yuriy Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering © 2018, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited. MoO3 and Mo2C have emerged as remarkable catalysts for the selective hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) of a wide range of oxygenates at low temperatures (that is, ≤673 K) and H2 pressures (that is, ≤1 bar). Although both catalysts can selectively cleave C–O bonds, the nature of their active sites remains unclear. Here we used operando near-ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to reveal important differences in the Mo 3d oxidation states between the two catalysts during the hydrodeoxygenation of anisole. This technique revealed that, although both catalysts featured a surface oxycarbidic phase, the oxygen content and the underlying phase of the material impacted the reactivity and product selectivity during the hydrodeoxygenation. MoO3 transitioned between 5+ and 6+ oxidation states during the operation, consistent with an oxygen-vacancy driven mechanism wherein the oxygenate is activated at undercoordinated Mo sites. In contrast, Mo2C showed negligible oxidation state changes during hydrodeoxygenation and maintained mostly 2+ states throughout the reaction. 2021-10-27T20:10:38Z 2021-10-27T20:10:38Z 2018 2019-09-10T18:44:37Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/135080 en 10.1038/S41929-018-0171-9 Nature Catalysis Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf Springer Science and Business Media LLC other univ website
spellingShingle Murugappan, Karthick
Anderson, Eric M
Teschner, Detre
Jones, Travis E
Skorupska, Katarzyna
Román-Leshkov, Yuriy
Operando NAP-XPS unveils differences in MoO3 and Mo2C during hydrodeoxygenation
title Operando NAP-XPS unveils differences in MoO3 and Mo2C during hydrodeoxygenation
title_full Operando NAP-XPS unveils differences in MoO3 and Mo2C during hydrodeoxygenation
title_fullStr Operando NAP-XPS unveils differences in MoO3 and Mo2C during hydrodeoxygenation
title_full_unstemmed Operando NAP-XPS unveils differences in MoO3 and Mo2C during hydrodeoxygenation
title_short Operando NAP-XPS unveils differences in MoO3 and Mo2C during hydrodeoxygenation
title_sort operando nap xps unveils differences in moo3 and mo2c during hydrodeoxygenation
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/135080
work_keys_str_mv AT murugappankarthick operandonapxpsunveilsdifferencesinmoo3andmo2cduringhydrodeoxygenation
AT andersonericm operandonapxpsunveilsdifferencesinmoo3andmo2cduringhydrodeoxygenation
AT teschnerdetre operandonapxpsunveilsdifferencesinmoo3andmo2cduringhydrodeoxygenation
AT jonestravise operandonapxpsunveilsdifferencesinmoo3andmo2cduringhydrodeoxygenation
AT skorupskakatarzyna operandonapxpsunveilsdifferencesinmoo3andmo2cduringhydrodeoxygenation
AT romanleshkovyuriy operandonapxpsunveilsdifferencesinmoo3andmo2cduringhydrodeoxygenation