Clinical decision support for high-cost imaging: A randomized clinical trial

© 2019 Doyle et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. There is widespread concern over the health...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Doyle, Joseph, Abraham, Sarah, Feeney, Laura, Reimer, Sarah, Finkelstein, Amy
Other Authors: Sloan School of Management
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/135117
_version_ 1826192601490915328
author Doyle, Joseph
Abraham, Sarah
Feeney, Laura
Reimer, Sarah
Finkelstein, Amy
author2 Sloan School of Management
author_facet Sloan School of Management
Doyle, Joseph
Abraham, Sarah
Feeney, Laura
Reimer, Sarah
Finkelstein, Amy
author_sort Doyle, Joseph
collection MIT
description © 2019 Doyle et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. There is widespread concern over the health risks and healthcare costs from potentially inappropriate high-cost imaging. As a result, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will soon require high-cost imaging orders to be accompanied by Clinical Decision Support (CDS): software that provides appropriateness information at the time orders are placed via a best practice alert for targeted (i.e. likely inappropriate) imaging orders, although the impacts of CDS in this context are unclear. In this randomized trial of 3,511 healthcare providers at Aurora Health Care, we study the impacts of CDS on the ordering behavior of providers. We find that CDS reduced targeted imaging orders by a statistically significant 6%, however there was no statistically significant change in the total number of high-cost scans or of low-cost scans. The results suggest that the impending CMS mandate requiring healthcare systems to adopt CDS may modestly increase the appropriateness of high-cost imaging.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:24:18Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/135117
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:24:18Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1351172023-03-01T21:07:02Z Clinical decision support for high-cost imaging: A randomized clinical trial Doyle, Joseph Abraham, Sarah Feeney, Laura Reimer, Sarah Finkelstein, Amy Sloan School of Management Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) © 2019 Doyle et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. There is widespread concern over the health risks and healthcare costs from potentially inappropriate high-cost imaging. As a result, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will soon require high-cost imaging orders to be accompanied by Clinical Decision Support (CDS): software that provides appropriateness information at the time orders are placed via a best practice alert for targeted (i.e. likely inappropriate) imaging orders, although the impacts of CDS in this context are unclear. In this randomized trial of 3,511 healthcare providers at Aurora Health Care, we study the impacts of CDS on the ordering behavior of providers. We find that CDS reduced targeted imaging orders by a statistically significant 6%, however there was no statistically significant change in the total number of high-cost scans or of low-cost scans. The results suggest that the impending CMS mandate requiring healthcare systems to adopt CDS may modestly increase the appropriateness of high-cost imaging. 2021-10-27T20:10:48Z 2021-10-27T20:10:48Z 2019 2019-10-22T18:00:58Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/135117 en 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0213373 PLoS ONE Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf Public Library of Science (PLoS) PLoS
spellingShingle Doyle, Joseph
Abraham, Sarah
Feeney, Laura
Reimer, Sarah
Finkelstein, Amy
Clinical decision support for high-cost imaging: A randomized clinical trial
title Clinical decision support for high-cost imaging: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Clinical decision support for high-cost imaging: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Clinical decision support for high-cost imaging: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Clinical decision support for high-cost imaging: A randomized clinical trial
title_short Clinical decision support for high-cost imaging: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort clinical decision support for high cost imaging a randomized clinical trial
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/135117
work_keys_str_mv AT doylejoseph clinicaldecisionsupportforhighcostimagingarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT abrahamsarah clinicaldecisionsupportforhighcostimagingarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT feeneylaura clinicaldecisionsupportforhighcostimagingarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT reimersarah clinicaldecisionsupportforhighcostimagingarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT finkelsteinamy clinicaldecisionsupportforhighcostimagingarandomizedclinicaltrial