Prosociality in the economic dictator game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise
© 2020. The authors license this article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Is prosociality parochial or universalist? To shed light on this issue, we examine the relationship between the amount of money given to a stranger (giving in an incentivized Dictator Game) and...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/135503 |
| _version_ | 1811082391321575424 |
|---|---|
| author | Mosleh, M Stewart, AJ Plotkin, JB Rand, DG |
| author2 | Sloan School of Management |
| author_facet | Sloan School of Management Mosleh, M Stewart, AJ Plotkin, JB Rand, DG |
| author_sort | Mosleh, M |
| collection | MIT |
| description | © 2020. The authors license this article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Is prosociality parochial or universalist? To shed light on this issue, we examine the relationship between the amount of money given to a stranger (giving in an incentivized Dictator Game) and intergroup attitudes and behavior in the context of randomly assigned teams (a minimal group paradigm) among N = 4,846 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers. Using a set of Dynamic Identity Diffusion Index measures, we find that participants who give more in the Dictator Game show less preferential identification with their team relative to the other team, and more identification with all participants regardless of team. Furthermore, in an incentivized Voter Game, participants who give more in the Dictator Game are more likely to support compromise by voting for the opposing team in order to avoid deadlock. Together, these results suggest that – at least in this subject pool and using these measures – prosociality is better characterized by universalism than parochialism. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-23T12:02:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | mit-1721.1/135503 |
| institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-23T12:02:20Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | mit-1721.1/1355032023-02-22T17:29:37Z Prosociality in the economic dictator game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise Mosleh, M Stewart, AJ Plotkin, JB Rand, DG Sloan School of Management Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences © 2020. The authors license this article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Is prosociality parochial or universalist? To shed light on this issue, we examine the relationship between the amount of money given to a stranger (giving in an incentivized Dictator Game) and intergroup attitudes and behavior in the context of randomly assigned teams (a minimal group paradigm) among N = 4,846 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers. Using a set of Dynamic Identity Diffusion Index measures, we find that participants who give more in the Dictator Game show less preferential identification with their team relative to the other team, and more identification with all participants regardless of team. Furthermore, in an incentivized Voter Game, participants who give more in the Dictator Game are more likely to support compromise by voting for the opposing team in order to avoid deadlock. Together, these results suggest that – at least in this subject pool and using these measures – prosociality is better characterized by universalism than parochialism. 2021-10-27T20:23:45Z 2021-10-27T20:23:45Z 2020-01-01 2021-03-22T15:13:03Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/135503 en http://journal.sjdm.org/vol15.1.html Judgment and Decision Making Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf Judgment and Decision Making |
| spellingShingle | Mosleh, M Stewart, AJ Plotkin, JB Rand, DG Prosociality in the economic dictator game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise |
| title | Prosociality in the economic dictator game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise |
| title_full | Prosociality in the economic dictator game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise |
| title_fullStr | Prosociality in the economic dictator game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise |
| title_full_unstemmed | Prosociality in the economic dictator game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise |
| title_short | Prosociality in the economic dictator game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise |
| title_sort | prosociality in the economic dictator game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/135503 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT moslehm prosocialityintheeconomicdictatorgameisassociatedwithlessparochialismandgreaterwillingnesstovoteforintergroupcompromise AT stewartaj prosocialityintheeconomicdictatorgameisassociatedwithlessparochialismandgreaterwillingnesstovoteforintergroupcompromise AT plotkinjb prosocialityintheeconomicdictatorgameisassociatedwithlessparochialismandgreaterwillingnesstovoteforintergroupcompromise AT randdg prosocialityintheeconomicdictatorgameisassociatedwithlessparochialismandgreaterwillingnesstovoteforintergroupcompromise |