Do Rating Agencies Benefit from Providing Higher Ratings? Evidence from the Consequences of Municipal Bond Ratings Recalibration
© University of Chicago on behalf of the Accounting Research Center, 2019 We ask whether credit rating agencies receive higher fees and gain greater market share when they provide more favorable ratings. To investigate this question, we use the 2010 rating scale recalibration by Moody's and Fit...
Main Authors: | BEATTY, ANNE, GILLETTE, JACQUELYN, PETACCHI, REINING, WEBER, JOSEPH |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Sloan School of Management |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021
|
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/136534 |
Similar Items
-
The Effect of Credit Ratings on Disclosure: Evidence from the Recalibration of Moody's Municipal Ratings
by: Gillette, Jacquelyn, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Hedge commitments and agency costs of debt: evidence from interest rate protection covenants and accounting conservatism
by: Beatty, Anne, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Bond rating agencies and the effects of a rating change
by: Migliozzi, Glenn T, et al.
Published: (2006) -
Why do ratings differ? - a political economy approach to explain the difference in corporate ratings issued by global rating agencies and national rating agencies.
by: Daniel Karl Hartmann
Published: (2014) -
Climate Change and Municipal Bond Ratings
by: Zhang, Cindy
Published: (2024)