Multimodal Loading Environment Predicts Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds’ Durability

Abstract Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds were considered the fourth generation of endovascular implants deemed to revolutionize cardiovascular interventions. Yet, unexpected high risk of scaffold thrombosis and post-procedural myocardial infractions quenched the early enthusiasm and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang, Pei-Jiang, Berti, Francesca, Antonini, Luca, Nezami, Farhad R, Petrini, Lorenza, Migliavacca, Francesco, Edelman, Elazer R
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Science
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer International Publishing 2021
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/136774
_version_ 1826203497313337344
author Wang, Pei-Jiang
Berti, Francesca
Antonini, Luca
Nezami, Farhad R
Petrini, Lorenza
Migliavacca, Francesco
Edelman, Elazer R
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Science
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Science
Wang, Pei-Jiang
Berti, Francesca
Antonini, Luca
Nezami, Farhad R
Petrini, Lorenza
Migliavacca, Francesco
Edelman, Elazer R
author_sort Wang, Pei-Jiang
collection MIT
description Abstract Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds were considered the fourth generation of endovascular implants deemed to revolutionize cardiovascular interventions. Yet, unexpected high risk of scaffold thrombosis and post-procedural myocardial infractions quenched the early enthusiasm and highlighted the gap between benchtop predictions and clinical observations. To better understand scaffold behavior in the mechanical environment of vessels, animal, and benchtop tests with multimodal loading environment were conducted using industrial standard scaffolds. Finite element analysis was also performed to study the relationship among structural failure, scaffold design, and load types. We identified that applying the combination of bending, axial compression, and torsion better reflects incidence observed in-vivo, far more than tranditional single mode loads. Predication of fracture locations is also more accurate when at least bending and axial compression are applied during benchtop tests (>60% fractures at connected peak). These structural failures may be initiated by implantation-induced microstructural damages and worsened by cyclic loads from the beating heart. Ignoring the multi-modal loading environment in benchtop fatigue tests and computational platforms can lead to undetected potential design defects, calling for redefining consensus evaluation strategies for scaffold performance. With the robust evaluation strategy presented herein, which exploits the results of in-vivo, in-vitro and in-silico investigations, we may be able to compare alternative designs of prototypes at the early stages of device development and optimize the performance of endovascular implants according to patients-specific vessel dynamics and lesion configurations in the future.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T12:37:58Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/136774
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T12:37:58Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1367742024-03-19T14:18:16Z Multimodal Loading Environment Predicts Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds’ Durability Wang, Pei-Jiang Berti, Francesca Antonini, Luca Nezami, Farhad R Petrini, Lorenza Migliavacca, Francesco Edelman, Elazer R Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Science Abstract Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds were considered the fourth generation of endovascular implants deemed to revolutionize cardiovascular interventions. Yet, unexpected high risk of scaffold thrombosis and post-procedural myocardial infractions quenched the early enthusiasm and highlighted the gap between benchtop predictions and clinical observations. To better understand scaffold behavior in the mechanical environment of vessels, animal, and benchtop tests with multimodal loading environment were conducted using industrial standard scaffolds. Finite element analysis was also performed to study the relationship among structural failure, scaffold design, and load types. We identified that applying the combination of bending, axial compression, and torsion better reflects incidence observed in-vivo, far more than tranditional single mode loads. Predication of fracture locations is also more accurate when at least bending and axial compression are applied during benchtop tests (>60% fractures at connected peak). These structural failures may be initiated by implantation-induced microstructural damages and worsened by cyclic loads from the beating heart. Ignoring the multi-modal loading environment in benchtop fatigue tests and computational platforms can lead to undetected potential design defects, calling for redefining consensus evaluation strategies for scaffold performance. With the robust evaluation strategy presented herein, which exploits the results of in-vivo, in-vitro and in-silico investigations, we may be able to compare alternative designs of prototypes at the early stages of device development and optimize the performance of endovascular implants according to patients-specific vessel dynamics and lesion configurations in the future. 2021-11-01T14:33:17Z 2021-11-01T14:33:17Z 2020-10-29 2021-04-21T03:35:30Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/136774 en https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02673-z Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Biomedical Engineering Society application/pdf Springer International Publishing Springer International Publishing
spellingShingle Wang, Pei-Jiang
Berti, Francesca
Antonini, Luca
Nezami, Farhad R
Petrini, Lorenza
Migliavacca, Francesco
Edelman, Elazer R
Multimodal Loading Environment Predicts Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds’ Durability
title Multimodal Loading Environment Predicts Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds’ Durability
title_full Multimodal Loading Environment Predicts Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds’ Durability
title_fullStr Multimodal Loading Environment Predicts Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds’ Durability
title_full_unstemmed Multimodal Loading Environment Predicts Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds’ Durability
title_short Multimodal Loading Environment Predicts Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds’ Durability
title_sort multimodal loading environment predicts bioresorbable vascular scaffolds durability
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/136774
work_keys_str_mv AT wangpeijiang multimodalloadingenvironmentpredictsbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsdurability
AT bertifrancesca multimodalloadingenvironmentpredictsbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsdurability
AT antoniniluca multimodalloadingenvironmentpredictsbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsdurability
AT nezamifarhadr multimodalloadingenvironmentpredictsbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsdurability
AT petrinilorenza multimodalloadingenvironmentpredictsbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsdurability
AT migliavaccafrancesco multimodalloadingenvironmentpredictsbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsdurability
AT edelmanelazerr multimodalloadingenvironmentpredictsbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsdurability