Maze Made Easy: Better and easier measurement of incremental processing difficulty

© 2019 Elsevier Inc. Behavioral measures of incremental language comprehension difficulty form a crucial part of the empirical basis of psycholinguistics. The two most common methods for obtaining these measures have significant limitations: eye tracking studies are resource-intensive, and self-pace...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boyce, Veronica, Futrell, Richard, Levy, Roger P
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier BV 2021
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138282
_version_ 1826192622310391808
author Boyce, Veronica
Futrell, Richard
Levy, Roger P
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Boyce, Veronica
Futrell, Richard
Levy, Roger P
author_sort Boyce, Veronica
collection MIT
description © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Behavioral measures of incremental language comprehension difficulty form a crucial part of the empirical basis of psycholinguistics. The two most common methods for obtaining these measures have significant limitations: eye tracking studies are resource-intensive, and self-paced reading can yield noisy data with poor localization. These limitations are even more severe for web-based crowdsourcing studies, where eye tracking is infeasible and self-paced reading is vulnerable to inattentive participants. Here we make a case for broader adoption of the Maze task, involving sequential forced choice between each successive word in a sentence and a contextually inappropriate distractor. We leverage natural language processing technology to automate the most researcher-laborious part of Maze – generating distractor materials – and show that the resulting A(uto)-Maze method has dramatically superior statistical power and localization for well-established syntactic ambiguity resolution phenomena. We make our code freely available online for widespread adoption of A-maze by the psycholinguistics community.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:25:45Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/138282
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:25:45Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier BV
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1382822023-03-30T18:57:13Z Maze Made Easy: Better and easier measurement of incremental processing difficulty Boyce, Veronica Futrell, Richard Levy, Roger P Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Behavioral measures of incremental language comprehension difficulty form a crucial part of the empirical basis of psycholinguistics. The two most common methods for obtaining these measures have significant limitations: eye tracking studies are resource-intensive, and self-paced reading can yield noisy data with poor localization. These limitations are even more severe for web-based crowdsourcing studies, where eye tracking is infeasible and self-paced reading is vulnerable to inattentive participants. Here we make a case for broader adoption of the Maze task, involving sequential forced choice between each successive word in a sentence and a contextually inappropriate distractor. We leverage natural language processing technology to automate the most researcher-laborious part of Maze – generating distractor materials – and show that the resulting A(uto)-Maze method has dramatically superior statistical power and localization for well-established syntactic ambiguity resolution phenomena. We make our code freely available online for widespread adoption of A-maze by the psycholinguistics community. 2021-12-01T17:55:16Z 2021-12-01T17:55:16Z 2020 2021-12-01T17:52:35Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138282 Boyce, Veronica, Futrell, Richard and Levy, Roger P. 2020. "Maze Made Easy: Better and easier measurement of incremental processing difficulty." Journal of Memory and Language, 111. en 10.1016/J.JML.2019.104082 Journal of Memory and Language Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ application/pdf Elsevier BV Other repository
spellingShingle Boyce, Veronica
Futrell, Richard
Levy, Roger P
Maze Made Easy: Better and easier measurement of incremental processing difficulty
title Maze Made Easy: Better and easier measurement of incremental processing difficulty
title_full Maze Made Easy: Better and easier measurement of incremental processing difficulty
title_fullStr Maze Made Easy: Better and easier measurement of incremental processing difficulty
title_full_unstemmed Maze Made Easy: Better and easier measurement of incremental processing difficulty
title_short Maze Made Easy: Better and easier measurement of incremental processing difficulty
title_sort maze made easy better and easier measurement of incremental processing difficulty
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138282
work_keys_str_mv AT boyceveronica mazemadeeasybetterandeasiermeasurementofincrementalprocessingdifficulty
AT futrellrichard mazemadeeasybetterandeasiermeasurementofincrementalprocessingdifficulty
AT levyrogerp mazemadeeasybetterandeasiermeasurementofincrementalprocessingdifficulty