Do domain-general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction? Re-evaluation of the evidence and a path forward

© 2019 Most current accounts of language comprehension agree on a role for prediction, but they disagree on the importance of domain-general executive resources in predictive behavior. In this opinion piece, we briefly review the evidence for linguistic prediction, and the findings that have been us...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryskin, Rachel, Levy, Roger P, Fedorenko, Evelina
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier BV 2021
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138410
_version_ 1826208028771221504
author Ryskin, Rachel
Levy, Roger P
Fedorenko, Evelina
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Ryskin, Rachel
Levy, Roger P
Fedorenko, Evelina
author_sort Ryskin, Rachel
collection MIT
description © 2019 Most current accounts of language comprehension agree on a role for prediction, but they disagree on the importance of domain-general executive resources in predictive behavior. In this opinion piece, we briefly review the evidence for linguistic prediction, and the findings that have been used to argue that prediction draws on domain-general executive resources. The most compelling evidence is an apparent reduction in predictive behavior during language comprehension in populations with lower executive resources, such as children, older adults, and second language (L2) learners. We propose that these between-population differences can be explained without invoking executive resources. Instead, differences in the quantity and kind of language experience that these populations bring to bear may affect the probability of engaging in predictive behavior, or simply make prediction effects more difficult to detect in paradigms designed for young adult native speakers. Thus, domain-specific prediction mechanisms remain a viable possibility. We discuss ways to further test accounts of linguistic prediction that do vs. do not require domain-general executive resources, using behavioral, computational, and brain imaging approaches.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T13:59:16Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/138410
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T13:59:16Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier BV
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1384102023-06-21T18:44:03Z Do domain-general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction? Re-evaluation of the evidence and a path forward Ryskin, Rachel Levy, Roger P Fedorenko, Evelina Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT © 2019 Most current accounts of language comprehension agree on a role for prediction, but they disagree on the importance of domain-general executive resources in predictive behavior. In this opinion piece, we briefly review the evidence for linguistic prediction, and the findings that have been used to argue that prediction draws on domain-general executive resources. The most compelling evidence is an apparent reduction in predictive behavior during language comprehension in populations with lower executive resources, such as children, older adults, and second language (L2) learners. We propose that these between-population differences can be explained without invoking executive resources. Instead, differences in the quantity and kind of language experience that these populations bring to bear may affect the probability of engaging in predictive behavior, or simply make prediction effects more difficult to detect in paradigms designed for young adult native speakers. Thus, domain-specific prediction mechanisms remain a viable possibility. We discuss ways to further test accounts of linguistic prediction that do vs. do not require domain-general executive resources, using behavioral, computational, and brain imaging approaches. 2021-12-09T19:38:34Z 2021-12-09T19:38:34Z 2020 2021-12-09T19:33:55Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138410 Ryskin, Rachel, Levy, Roger P and Fedorenko, Evelina. 2020. "Do domain-general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction? Re-evaluation of the evidence and a path forward." Neuropsychologia, 136. en 10.1016/J.NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA.2019.107258 Neuropsychologia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ application/pdf Elsevier BV Prof. Fedorenko
spellingShingle Ryskin, Rachel
Levy, Roger P
Fedorenko, Evelina
Do domain-general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction? Re-evaluation of the evidence and a path forward
title Do domain-general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction? Re-evaluation of the evidence and a path forward
title_full Do domain-general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction? Re-evaluation of the evidence and a path forward
title_fullStr Do domain-general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction? Re-evaluation of the evidence and a path forward
title_full_unstemmed Do domain-general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction? Re-evaluation of the evidence and a path forward
title_short Do domain-general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction? Re-evaluation of the evidence and a path forward
title_sort do domain general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction re evaluation of the evidence and a path forward
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138410
work_keys_str_mv AT ryskinrachel dodomaingeneralexecutiveresourcesplayaroleinlinguisticpredictionreevaluationoftheevidenceandapathforward
AT levyrogerp dodomaingeneralexecutiveresourcesplayaroleinlinguisticpredictionreevaluationoftheevidenceandapathforward
AT fedorenkoevelina dodomaingeneralexecutiveresourcesplayaroleinlinguisticpredictionreevaluationoftheevidenceandapathforward