Evaluating the Associations between Forward Collision Warning Severity and Driving Context

Forward collision warning (FCW) systems typically employ forward sensing technologies to identify possible forward collisions and provide an alert to the driver in the event they have not recognized a threat. These systems have demonstrated safety benefits. However, because the base rate of collisio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seaman, Sean, Gershon, Pnina, Angell, Linda, Mehler, Bruce, Reimer, Bryan
Format: Article
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/139646
_version_ 1826197305203621888
author Seaman, Sean
Gershon, Pnina
Angell, Linda
Mehler, Bruce
Reimer, Bryan
author_facet Seaman, Sean
Gershon, Pnina
Angell, Linda
Mehler, Bruce
Reimer, Bryan
author_sort Seaman, Sean
collection MIT
description Forward collision warning (FCW) systems typically employ forward sensing technologies to identify possible forward collisions and provide an alert to the driver in the event they have not recognized a threat. These systems have demonstrated safety benefits. However, because the base rate of collisions is low, sensitive FCW systems can provide a high rate of alarms in situations with no or low probability of collision, which may negatively impact driver responsiveness and satisfaction. We examined over 2000 naturally occurring FCWs in two modern vehicles as a part of a naturalistic driving study investigation into advanced vehicle technologies. Analysts used cabin and forward camera footage, as well as environmental characteristics, to judge the likelihood of a crash during each alert, which were used to model the likelihood of an alert representing a possible collision. Only nine FCWs were considered “crash possible and imminent”. Road-type, speed, traffic density, and deceleration profiles distinguished between alert severity. Modeling outcomes provide clues for reducing nuisance and false alerts, and the method of using subjective video annotation combined with vehicle kinematics shows promise for investigating FCW alerts in the real world.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:46:00Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/139646
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:46:00Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1396462022-01-21T03:28:47Z Evaluating the Associations between Forward Collision Warning Severity and Driving Context Seaman, Sean Gershon, Pnina Angell, Linda Mehler, Bruce Reimer, Bryan Forward collision warning (FCW) systems typically employ forward sensing technologies to identify possible forward collisions and provide an alert to the driver in the event they have not recognized a threat. These systems have demonstrated safety benefits. However, because the base rate of collisions is low, sensitive FCW systems can provide a high rate of alarms in situations with no or low probability of collision, which may negatively impact driver responsiveness and satisfaction. We examined over 2000 naturally occurring FCWs in two modern vehicles as a part of a naturalistic driving study investigation into advanced vehicle technologies. Analysts used cabin and forward camera footage, as well as environmental characteristics, to judge the likelihood of a crash during each alert, which were used to model the likelihood of an alert representing a possible collision. Only nine FCWs were considered “crash possible and imminent”. Road-type, speed, traffic density, and deceleration profiles distinguished between alert severity. Modeling outcomes provide clues for reducing nuisance and false alerts, and the method of using subjective video annotation combined with vehicle kinematics shows promise for investigating FCW alerts in the real world. 2022-01-20T19:31:08Z 2022-01-20T19:31:08Z 2022-01-20 2022-01-20T15:24:54Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/139646 Safety 8 (1): 5 (2022) PUBLISHER_CC http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/safety8010005 Creative Commons Attribution https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
spellingShingle Seaman, Sean
Gershon, Pnina
Angell, Linda
Mehler, Bruce
Reimer, Bryan
Evaluating the Associations between Forward Collision Warning Severity and Driving Context
title Evaluating the Associations between Forward Collision Warning Severity and Driving Context
title_full Evaluating the Associations between Forward Collision Warning Severity and Driving Context
title_fullStr Evaluating the Associations between Forward Collision Warning Severity and Driving Context
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Associations between Forward Collision Warning Severity and Driving Context
title_short Evaluating the Associations between Forward Collision Warning Severity and Driving Context
title_sort evaluating the associations between forward collision warning severity and driving context
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/139646
work_keys_str_mv AT seamansean evaluatingtheassociationsbetweenforwardcollisionwarningseverityanddrivingcontext
AT gershonpnina evaluatingtheassociationsbetweenforwardcollisionwarningseverityanddrivingcontext
AT angelllinda evaluatingtheassociationsbetweenforwardcollisionwarningseverityanddrivingcontext
AT mehlerbruce evaluatingtheassociationsbetweenforwardcollisionwarningseverityanddrivingcontext
AT reimerbryan evaluatingtheassociationsbetweenforwardcollisionwarningseverityanddrivingcontext