No fact of the middle

A middle fact is a true proposition about what would have happened had A been true (where A is in fact false), whose truth isn't entailed by any non-counterfactual facts. I argue that there are no middle facts; if there were, we wouldn't know them, and our ignorance of them would result in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Khoo, Justin
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/140431
_version_ 1826201595988148224
author Khoo, Justin
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Khoo, Justin
author_sort Khoo, Justin
collection MIT
description A middle fact is a true proposition about what would have happened had A been true (where A is in fact false), whose truth isn't entailed by any non-counterfactual facts. I argue that there are no middle facts; if there were, we wouldn't know them, and our ignorance of them would result in ignorance about whether regret is fitting in cases where we clearly know it is. But there's a problem. Consider an unflipped fair coin which is such that no non-counterfactual fact determines that it would have landed heads had it been flipped (or tails had it been flipped). If there are no middle facts, it's not true that it would have landed heads had it been flipped nor that it would have landed tails had it been flipped. Yet each counterfactual is still possibly true for all we know. I argue that we can resolve this tension in the anti-middle fact position, further strengthening the case against middle facts.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:53:52Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/140431
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T11:53:52Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1404312024-06-06T19:59:08Z No fact of the middle Khoo, Justin Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy A middle fact is a true proposition about what would have happened had A been true (where A is in fact false), whose truth isn't entailed by any non-counterfactual facts. I argue that there are no middle facts; if there were, we wouldn't know them, and our ignorance of them would result in ignorance about whether regret is fitting in cases where we clearly know it is. But there's a problem. Consider an unflipped fair coin which is such that no non-counterfactual fact determines that it would have landed heads had it been flipped (or tails had it been flipped). If there are no middle facts, it's not true that it would have landed heads had it been flipped nor that it would have landed tails had it been flipped. Yet each counterfactual is still possibly true for all we know. I argue that we can resolve this tension in the anti-middle fact position, further strengthening the case against middle facts. 2022-02-16T18:23:06Z 2022-02-16T18:23:06Z 2021-09-12 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 0029-4624 1468-0068 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/140431 Khoo, J. No fact of the middle. Noûs. 2021; 1– 23. en http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nous.12389 Noûs Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ application/pdf Wiley Wiley
spellingShingle Khoo, Justin
No fact of the middle
title No fact of the middle
title_full No fact of the middle
title_fullStr No fact of the middle
title_full_unstemmed No fact of the middle
title_short No fact of the middle
title_sort no fact of the middle
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/140431
work_keys_str_mv AT khoojustin nofactofthemiddle