What Could Go Wrong: Adults and Children Calibrate Predictions and Explanations of Others' Actions Based on Relative Reward and Danger
When human adults make decisions (e.g., wearing a seat belt), we often consider the negative consequences that would ensue if our actions were to fail, even if we have never experienced such a failure. Do the same considerations guide our understanding of other people's decisions? In this paper...
Main Authors: | Gjata, Nensi N, Ullman, Tomer D, Spelke, Elizabeth S, Liu, Shari |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2022
|
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/144141 |
Similar Items
-
Dangerous Ground: One-Year-Old Infants are Sensitive to Peril in Other Agents’ Action Plans
by: Liu, Shari, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Ten-month-old infants infer the value of goals from the costs of actions
by: Liu, Shari, et al.
Published: (2017) -
What could go wrong? Introspective radar odometry in challenging environments
by: Aldera, R, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Employers and meeting the Government's apprenticeship target: what could possibly go wrong?
by: James Relly, S, et al.
Published: (2016) -
“What could possibly go wrong?” Logging HRI data for robot accident investigations
by: Winkle, K, et al.
Published: (2020)