Competing effects of vegetation density on sedimentation in deltaic marshes

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Marsh vegetation, a definitive component of delta ecosystems, has a strong effect on sediment retention and land-building, controlling both how much sediment can be delivered to and how much is retained by the marsh. An understanding of how...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xu, Yuan, Esposito, Christopher R, Beltrán-Burgos, Maricel, Nepf, Heidi M
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2022
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/145509
_version_ 1826194488606851072
author Xu, Yuan
Esposito, Christopher R
Beltrán-Burgos, Maricel
Nepf, Heidi M
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Xu, Yuan
Esposito, Christopher R
Beltrán-Burgos, Maricel
Nepf, Heidi M
author_sort Xu, Yuan
collection MIT
description <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Marsh vegetation, a definitive component of delta ecosystems, has a strong effect on sediment retention and land-building, controlling both how much sediment can be delivered to and how much is retained by the marsh. An understanding of how vegetation influences these processes would improve the restoration and management of marshes. We use a random displacement model to simulate sediment transport, deposition, and resuspension within a marsh. As vegetation density increases, velocity declines, which reduces sediment supply to the marsh, but also reduces resuspension, which enhances sediment retention within the marsh. The competing trends of supply and retention produce a nonlinear relationship between sedimentation and vegetation density, such that an intermediate density yields the maximum sedimentation. Two patterns of sedimentation spatial distribution emerge in the simulation, and the exponential distribution only occurs when resuspension is absent. With resuspension, sediment is delivered farther into the marsh and in a uniform distribution. The model was validated with field observations of sedimentation response to seasonal variation in vegetation density observed in a marsh within the Mississippi River Delta.</jats:p>
first_indexed 2024-09-23T09:56:52Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/145509
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T09:56:52Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1455092022-09-30T17:54:16Z Competing effects of vegetation density on sedimentation in deltaic marshes Xu, Yuan Esposito, Christopher R Beltrán-Burgos, Maricel Nepf, Heidi M Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Marsh vegetation, a definitive component of delta ecosystems, has a strong effect on sediment retention and land-building, controlling both how much sediment can be delivered to and how much is retained by the marsh. An understanding of how vegetation influences these processes would improve the restoration and management of marshes. We use a random displacement model to simulate sediment transport, deposition, and resuspension within a marsh. As vegetation density increases, velocity declines, which reduces sediment supply to the marsh, but also reduces resuspension, which enhances sediment retention within the marsh. The competing trends of supply and retention produce a nonlinear relationship between sedimentation and vegetation density, such that an intermediate density yields the maximum sedimentation. Two patterns of sedimentation spatial distribution emerge in the simulation, and the exponential distribution only occurs when resuspension is absent. With resuspension, sediment is delivered farther into the marsh and in a uniform distribution. The model was validated with field observations of sedimentation response to seasonal variation in vegetation density observed in a marsh within the Mississippi River Delta.</jats:p> 2022-09-19T18:56:38Z 2022-09-19T18:56:38Z 2022-08-08 2022-09-19T18:43:14Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/145509 Xu, Yuan, Esposito, Christopher R, Beltrán-Burgos, Maricel and Nepf, Heidi M. 2022. "Competing effects of vegetation density on sedimentation in deltaic marshes." Nature Communications, 13 (1). en 10.1038/s41467-022-32270-8 Nature Communications Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf Springer Science and Business Media LLC Nature
spellingShingle Xu, Yuan
Esposito, Christopher R
Beltrán-Burgos, Maricel
Nepf, Heidi M
Competing effects of vegetation density on sedimentation in deltaic marshes
title Competing effects of vegetation density on sedimentation in deltaic marshes
title_full Competing effects of vegetation density on sedimentation in deltaic marshes
title_fullStr Competing effects of vegetation density on sedimentation in deltaic marshes
title_full_unstemmed Competing effects of vegetation density on sedimentation in deltaic marshes
title_short Competing effects of vegetation density on sedimentation in deltaic marshes
title_sort competing effects of vegetation density on sedimentation in deltaic marshes
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/145509
work_keys_str_mv AT xuyuan competingeffectsofvegetationdensityonsedimentationindeltaicmarshes
AT espositochristopherr competingeffectsofvegetationdensityonsedimentationindeltaicmarshes
AT beltranburgosmaricel competingeffectsofvegetationdensityonsedimentationindeltaicmarshes
AT nepfheidim competingeffectsofvegetationdensityonsedimentationindeltaicmarshes