Functional connectivity MRI quality control procedures in CONN

<jats:p>Quality control (QC) for functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (FC-MRI) is critical to ensure the validity of neuroimaging studies. Noise confounds are common in MRI data and, if not accounted for, may introduce biases in functional measures affecting the validity, replica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morfini, Francesca, Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan, Nieto-Castañón, Alfonso
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Format: Article
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/150448
_version_ 1811097175222910976
author Morfini, Francesca
Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan
Nieto-Castañón, Alfonso
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Morfini, Francesca
Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan
Nieto-Castañón, Alfonso
author_sort Morfini, Francesca
collection MIT
description <jats:p>Quality control (QC) for functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (FC-MRI) is critical to ensure the validity of neuroimaging studies. Noise confounds are common in MRI data and, if not accounted for, may introduce biases in functional measures affecting the validity, replicability, and interpretation of FC-MRI study results. Although FC-MRI analysis rests on the assumption of adequate data processing, QC is underutilized and not systematically reported. Here, we describe a quality control pipeline for the visual and automated evaluation of MRI data implemented as part of the CONN toolbox. We analyzed publicly available resting state MRI data (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 139 from 7 MRI sites) from the FMRI Open QC Project. Preprocessing steps included realignment, unwarp, normalization, segmentation, outlier identification, and smoothing. Data denoising was performed based on the combination of scrubbing, motion regression, and aCompCor – a principal component characterization of noise from minimally eroded masks of white matter and of cerebrospinal fluid tissues. Participant-level QC procedures included visual inspection of raw-level data and of representative images after each preprocessing step for each run, as well as the computation of automated descriptive QC measures such as average framewise displacement, average global signal change, prevalence of outlier scans, MNI to anatomical and functional overlap, anatomical to functional overlap, residual BOLD timeseries variability, effective degrees of freedom, and global correlation strength. Dataset-level QC procedures included the evaluation of inter-subject variability in the distributions of edge connectivity in a 1,000-node graph (FC distribution displays), and the estimation of residual associations across participants between functional connectivity strength and potential noise indicators such as participant’s head motion and prevalence of outlier scans (QC-FC analyses). QC procedures are demonstrated on the reference dataset with an emphasis on visualization, and general recommendations for best practices are discussed in the context of functional connectivity and other fMRI analysis. We hope this work contributes toward the dissemination and standardization of QC testing performance reporting among peers and in scientific journals.</jats:p>
first_indexed 2024-09-23T16:55:32Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/150448
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T16:55:32Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media SA
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1504482024-01-31T21:16:46Z Functional connectivity MRI quality control procedures in CONN Morfini, Francesca Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan Nieto-Castañón, Alfonso Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT General Neuroscience <jats:p>Quality control (QC) for functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (FC-MRI) is critical to ensure the validity of neuroimaging studies. Noise confounds are common in MRI data and, if not accounted for, may introduce biases in functional measures affecting the validity, replicability, and interpretation of FC-MRI study results. Although FC-MRI analysis rests on the assumption of adequate data processing, QC is underutilized and not systematically reported. Here, we describe a quality control pipeline for the visual and automated evaluation of MRI data implemented as part of the CONN toolbox. We analyzed publicly available resting state MRI data (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 139 from 7 MRI sites) from the FMRI Open QC Project. Preprocessing steps included realignment, unwarp, normalization, segmentation, outlier identification, and smoothing. Data denoising was performed based on the combination of scrubbing, motion regression, and aCompCor – a principal component characterization of noise from minimally eroded masks of white matter and of cerebrospinal fluid tissues. Participant-level QC procedures included visual inspection of raw-level data and of representative images after each preprocessing step for each run, as well as the computation of automated descriptive QC measures such as average framewise displacement, average global signal change, prevalence of outlier scans, MNI to anatomical and functional overlap, anatomical to functional overlap, residual BOLD timeseries variability, effective degrees of freedom, and global correlation strength. Dataset-level QC procedures included the evaluation of inter-subject variability in the distributions of edge connectivity in a 1,000-node graph (FC distribution displays), and the estimation of residual associations across participants between functional connectivity strength and potential noise indicators such as participant’s head motion and prevalence of outlier scans (QC-FC analyses). QC procedures are demonstrated on the reference dataset with an emphasis on visualization, and general recommendations for best practices are discussed in the context of functional connectivity and other fMRI analysis. We hope this work contributes toward the dissemination and standardization of QC testing performance reporting among peers and in scientific journals.</jats:p> 2023-04-06T18:38:26Z 2023-04-06T18:38:26Z 2023-03-23 Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1662-453X https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/150448 Morfini, Francesca, Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan and Nieto-Castañón, Alfonso. 2023. "Functional connectivity MRI quality control procedures in CONN." 17. 10.3389/fnins.2023.1092125 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf Frontiers Media SA Frontiers
spellingShingle General Neuroscience
Morfini, Francesca
Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan
Nieto-Castañón, Alfonso
Functional connectivity MRI quality control procedures in CONN
title Functional connectivity MRI quality control procedures in CONN
title_full Functional connectivity MRI quality control procedures in CONN
title_fullStr Functional connectivity MRI quality control procedures in CONN
title_full_unstemmed Functional connectivity MRI quality control procedures in CONN
title_short Functional connectivity MRI quality control procedures in CONN
title_sort functional connectivity mri quality control procedures in conn
topic General Neuroscience
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/150448
work_keys_str_mv AT morfinifrancesca functionalconnectivitymriqualitycontrolproceduresinconn
AT whitfieldgabrielisusan functionalconnectivitymriqualitycontrolproceduresinconn
AT nietocastanonalfonso functionalconnectivitymriqualitycontrolproceduresinconn