Clinical validation of a smartphone-based retinal camera for diabetic retinopathy screening
Abstract Aims This study aims to compare the performance of a handheld fundus camera (Eyer) and standard tabletop fundus cameras (Visucam 500, Visucam 540, and Canon CR-2) for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema screening....
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Milan
2023
|
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/150678 |
_version_ | 1826200816350920704 |
---|---|
author | de Oliveira, Juliana A. E. Nakayama, Luis F. Zago Ribeiro, Lucas de Oliveira, Talita V. F. Choi, Stefano N. J. H. Neto, Edgar M. Cardoso, Viviane S. Dib, Sergio A. Melo, Gustavo B. Regatieri, Caio V. S. Malerbi, Fernando K. |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics de Oliveira, Juliana A. E. Nakayama, Luis F. Zago Ribeiro, Lucas de Oliveira, Talita V. F. Choi, Stefano N. J. H. Neto, Edgar M. Cardoso, Viviane S. Dib, Sergio A. Melo, Gustavo B. Regatieri, Caio V. S. Malerbi, Fernando K. |
author_sort | de Oliveira, Juliana A. E. |
collection | MIT |
description | Abstract
Aims
This study aims to compare the performance of a handheld fundus camera (Eyer) and standard tabletop fundus cameras (Visucam 500, Visucam 540, and Canon CR-2) for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema screening.
Methods
This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study that included images from 327 individuals with diabetes. The participants underwent pharmacological mydriasis and fundus photography in two fields (macula and optic disk centered) with both strategies. All images were acquired by trained healthcare professionals, de-identified, and graded independently by two masked ophthalmologists, with a third senior ophthalmologist adjudicating in discordant cases. The International Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy was used for grading, and demographic data, diabetic retinopathy classification, artifacts, and image quality were compared between devices. The tabletop senior ophthalmologist adjudication label was used as the ground truth for comparative analysis. A univariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the relationship of each independent factor in referable diabetic retinopathy.
Results
The mean age of participants was 57.03 years (SD 16.82, 9–90 years), and the mean duration of diabetes was 16.35 years (SD 9.69, 1–60 years). Age (P = .005), diabetes duration (P = .004), body mass index (P = .005), and hypertension (P < .001) were statistically different between referable and non-referable patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a positive association between male sex (OR 1.687) and hypertension (OR 3.603) with referable diabetic retinopathy. The agreement between devices for diabetic retinopathy classification was 73.18%, with a weighted kappa of 0.808 (almost perfect). The agreement for macular edema was 88.48%, with a kappa of 0.809 (almost perfect). For referable diabetic retinopathy, the agreement was 85.88%, with a kappa of 0.716 (substantial), sensitivity of 0.906, and specificity of 0.808. As for image quality, 84.02% of tabletop fundus camera images were gradable and 85.31% of the Eyer images were gradable.
Conclusions
Our study shows that the handheld retinal camera Eyer performed comparably to standard tabletop fundus cameras for diabetic retinopathy and macular edema screening. The high agreement with tabletop devices, portability, and low costs makes the handheld retinal camera a promising tool for increasing coverage of diabetic retinopathy screening programs, particularly in low-income countries. Early diagnosis and treatment have the potential to prevent avoidable blindness, and the present validation study brings evidence that supports its contribution to diabetic retinopathy early diagnosis and treatment. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T11:42:15Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/150678 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T11:42:15Z |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/1506782023-05-16T03:32:50Z Clinical validation of a smartphone-based retinal camera for diabetic retinopathy screening de Oliveira, Juliana A. E. Nakayama, Luis F. Zago Ribeiro, Lucas de Oliveira, Talita V. F. Choi, Stefano N. J. H. Neto, Edgar M. Cardoso, Viviane S. Dib, Sergio A. Melo, Gustavo B. Regatieri, Caio V. S. Malerbi, Fernando K. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics Abstract Aims This study aims to compare the performance of a handheld fundus camera (Eyer) and standard tabletop fundus cameras (Visucam 500, Visucam 540, and Canon CR-2) for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema screening. Methods This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study that included images from 327 individuals with diabetes. The participants underwent pharmacological mydriasis and fundus photography in two fields (macula and optic disk centered) with both strategies. All images were acquired by trained healthcare professionals, de-identified, and graded independently by two masked ophthalmologists, with a third senior ophthalmologist adjudicating in discordant cases. The International Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy was used for grading, and demographic data, diabetic retinopathy classification, artifacts, and image quality were compared between devices. The tabletop senior ophthalmologist adjudication label was used as the ground truth for comparative analysis. A univariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the relationship of each independent factor in referable diabetic retinopathy. Results The mean age of participants was 57.03 years (SD 16.82, 9–90 years), and the mean duration of diabetes was 16.35 years (SD 9.69, 1–60 years). Age (P = .005), diabetes duration (P = .004), body mass index (P = .005), and hypertension (P < .001) were statistically different between referable and non-referable patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a positive association between male sex (OR 1.687) and hypertension (OR 3.603) with referable diabetic retinopathy. The agreement between devices for diabetic retinopathy classification was 73.18%, with a weighted kappa of 0.808 (almost perfect). The agreement for macular edema was 88.48%, with a kappa of 0.809 (almost perfect). For referable diabetic retinopathy, the agreement was 85.88%, with a kappa of 0.716 (substantial), sensitivity of 0.906, and specificity of 0.808. As for image quality, 84.02% of tabletop fundus camera images were gradable and 85.31% of the Eyer images were gradable. Conclusions Our study shows that the handheld retinal camera Eyer performed comparably to standard tabletop fundus cameras for diabetic retinopathy and macular edema screening. The high agreement with tabletop devices, portability, and low costs makes the handheld retinal camera a promising tool for increasing coverage of diabetic retinopathy screening programs, particularly in low-income countries. Early diagnosis and treatment have the potential to prevent avoidable blindness, and the present validation study brings evidence that supports its contribution to diabetic retinopathy early diagnosis and treatment. 2023-05-15T19:22:26Z 2023-05-15T19:22:26Z 2023-05-07 2023-05-14T03:11:48Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/150678 de Oliveira, Juliana A. E., Nakayama, Luis F., Zago Ribeiro, Lucas, de Oliveira, Talita V. F., Choi, Stefano N. J. H. et al. 2023. "Clinical validation of a smartphone-based retinal camera for diabetic retinopathy screening." PUBLISHER_CC en https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-023-02105-z Creative Commons Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ The Author(s) application/pdf Springer Milan Springer Milan |
spellingShingle | de Oliveira, Juliana A. E. Nakayama, Luis F. Zago Ribeiro, Lucas de Oliveira, Talita V. F. Choi, Stefano N. J. H. Neto, Edgar M. Cardoso, Viviane S. Dib, Sergio A. Melo, Gustavo B. Regatieri, Caio V. S. Malerbi, Fernando K. Clinical validation of a smartphone-based retinal camera for diabetic retinopathy screening |
title | Clinical validation of a smartphone-based retinal camera for diabetic retinopathy screening |
title_full | Clinical validation of a smartphone-based retinal camera for diabetic retinopathy screening |
title_fullStr | Clinical validation of a smartphone-based retinal camera for diabetic retinopathy screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical validation of a smartphone-based retinal camera for diabetic retinopathy screening |
title_short | Clinical validation of a smartphone-based retinal camera for diabetic retinopathy screening |
title_sort | clinical validation of a smartphone based retinal camera for diabetic retinopathy screening |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/150678 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveirajulianaae clinicalvalidationofasmartphonebasedretinalcamerafordiabeticretinopathyscreening AT nakayamaluisf clinicalvalidationofasmartphonebasedretinalcamerafordiabeticretinopathyscreening AT zagoribeirolucas clinicalvalidationofasmartphonebasedretinalcamerafordiabeticretinopathyscreening AT deoliveiratalitavf clinicalvalidationofasmartphonebasedretinalcamerafordiabeticretinopathyscreening AT choistefanonjh clinicalvalidationofasmartphonebasedretinalcamerafordiabeticretinopathyscreening AT netoedgarm clinicalvalidationofasmartphonebasedretinalcamerafordiabeticretinopathyscreening AT cardosovivianes clinicalvalidationofasmartphonebasedretinalcamerafordiabeticretinopathyscreening AT dibsergioa clinicalvalidationofasmartphonebasedretinalcamerafordiabeticretinopathyscreening AT melogustavob clinicalvalidationofasmartphonebasedretinalcamerafordiabeticretinopathyscreening AT regatiericaiovs clinicalvalidationofasmartphonebasedretinalcamerafordiabeticretinopathyscreening AT malerbifernandok clinicalvalidationofasmartphonebasedretinalcamerafordiabeticretinopathyscreening |