Power and Control in Disinvested Affordable Housing: San Francisco’s Limited Equity Housing Co-operatives

The promise of the co-operative housing typology extends beyond providing stable, affordable housing. Co-operatives strive to offer a resident-centered site of democratic participation, where ownership and limited equity combine to provide both collective and shareholder ownership of a valuable comm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cohen, Dylan
Other Authors: Thompson, Phillip
Format: Thesis
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2023
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/152508
_version_ 1811069432099766272
author Cohen, Dylan
author2 Thompson, Phillip
author_facet Thompson, Phillip
Cohen, Dylan
author_sort Cohen, Dylan
collection MIT
description The promise of the co-operative housing typology extends beyond providing stable, affordable housing. Co-operatives strive to offer a resident-centered site of democratic participation, where ownership and limited equity combine to provide both collective and shareholder ownership of a valuable community asset. Contentiously, local governments and civic institutions seek certainty and control in housing, prioritizing technical expertise and institutional relationships over deeper investment in resident-owner capacity. Affordable housing practitioners face complex and politicized projects, where co-op health is often threatened by mistrust, institutional failures, and funding scarcity. In San Francisco, more than 2,000 limited equity housing co-operative units constitute a significant portion of the city’s legacy 1960s and 70s federally-funded housing stock. Co-ops routinely fall into crisis, where residents rely on dysfunctional boards, ill-suited housing management companies, and insufficient government support for their survival. Numerous co-ops face critical survival questions, including deferred maintenance and disrepair, potential redevelopment, political instability, and waning institutional support. This client-linked thesis delves into the landscape of one local government's relationship with its co-operative housing ecosystem. Through dozens of interviews, a literature review, policy analysis, and several case studies of existing co-ops, this thesis elucidates present-day challenges and findings, and by discussing peer-city case studies of Vancouver, Canada, and Washington, D.C., proposes viable solutions charting a path forward.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T08:10:24Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/152508
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T08:10:24Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1525082023-10-19T03:57:57Z Power and Control in Disinvested Affordable Housing: San Francisco’s Limited Equity Housing Co-operatives Cohen, Dylan Thompson, Phillip Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning The promise of the co-operative housing typology extends beyond providing stable, affordable housing. Co-operatives strive to offer a resident-centered site of democratic participation, where ownership and limited equity combine to provide both collective and shareholder ownership of a valuable community asset. Contentiously, local governments and civic institutions seek certainty and control in housing, prioritizing technical expertise and institutional relationships over deeper investment in resident-owner capacity. Affordable housing practitioners face complex and politicized projects, where co-op health is often threatened by mistrust, institutional failures, and funding scarcity. In San Francisco, more than 2,000 limited equity housing co-operative units constitute a significant portion of the city’s legacy 1960s and 70s federally-funded housing stock. Co-ops routinely fall into crisis, where residents rely on dysfunctional boards, ill-suited housing management companies, and insufficient government support for their survival. Numerous co-ops face critical survival questions, including deferred maintenance and disrepair, potential redevelopment, political instability, and waning institutional support. This client-linked thesis delves into the landscape of one local government's relationship with its co-operative housing ecosystem. Through dozens of interviews, a literature review, policy analysis, and several case studies of existing co-ops, this thesis elucidates present-day challenges and findings, and by discussing peer-city case studies of Vancouver, Canada, and Washington, D.C., proposes viable solutions charting a path forward. M.C.P. 2023-10-18T17:11:46Z 2023-10-18T17:11:46Z 2023-06 2023-09-18T20:07:12.380Z Thesis https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/152508 In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted Copyright retained by author(s) https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/ application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Cohen, Dylan
Power and Control in Disinvested Affordable Housing: San Francisco’s Limited Equity Housing Co-operatives
title Power and Control in Disinvested Affordable Housing: San Francisco’s Limited Equity Housing Co-operatives
title_full Power and Control in Disinvested Affordable Housing: San Francisco’s Limited Equity Housing Co-operatives
title_fullStr Power and Control in Disinvested Affordable Housing: San Francisco’s Limited Equity Housing Co-operatives
title_full_unstemmed Power and Control in Disinvested Affordable Housing: San Francisco’s Limited Equity Housing Co-operatives
title_short Power and Control in Disinvested Affordable Housing: San Francisco’s Limited Equity Housing Co-operatives
title_sort power and control in disinvested affordable housing san francisco s limited equity housing co operatives
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/152508
work_keys_str_mv AT cohendylan powerandcontrolindisinvestedaffordablehousingsanfranciscoslimitedequityhousingcooperatives