Goals, Play, and Cognitive Pragmatism: A study of flexible human minds

Few phenomena in childhood are as compelling or mystifying as play. While many animals play, human play is distinguished by the sheer diversity of goals that we pursue, even as adults. Yet the seeming inutility of play belies one of the hallmarks of intelligence: a remarkably flexible ability to rea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chu, Junyi
Other Authors: Schulz, Laura E.
Format: Thesis
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2023
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/152563
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2778-6317
_version_ 1826211038554488832
author Chu, Junyi
author2 Schulz, Laura E.
author_facet Schulz, Laura E.
Chu, Junyi
author_sort Chu, Junyi
collection MIT
description Few phenomena in childhood are as compelling or mystifying as play. While many animals play, human play is distinguished by the sheer diversity of goals that we pursue, even as adults. Yet the seeming inutility of play belies one of the hallmarks of intelligence: a remarkably flexible ability to reason and plan in novel situations. What kind of mind generates and pursues so many goals, and has so much fun in the process? In this dissertation, I suggest that answering this question requires us to go beyond current accounts of rational action and exploration. To map out the path forward I present three lines of research involving behavioral experiments with young children (ages four to six years) and adult comparisons. In study one I find that adults and children endorse speculative conjectures, even when implausible or lacking evidence, because we primarily evaluate novel proposals based on how well it answers our questions. In study two I demonstrate that children at play spontaneously take unnecessarily costly actions and pursue prima facie inefficient plans, even though they minimize costs when achieving similar goals in non-play contexts. Finally, study three demonstrates that adults and children value their goals from the moment they are chosen: participants stick with their goals even when less costly alternatives are available. On their own, each study contributes novel empirical findings and theoretical insights to their respective literature in explanation, play, and planning. Taken together however, they suggest a broader conclusion: that humans treat goals as valuable constraints for reasoning and decision-making. By paying attention to the goals we adopt and the problems we make for ourselves, we may explain much more of the richness and flexibility of the human mind.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:59:35Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/152563
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:59:35Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1525632023-11-01T03:16:56Z Goals, Play, and Cognitive Pragmatism: A study of flexible human minds Chu, Junyi Schulz, Laura E. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Few phenomena in childhood are as compelling or mystifying as play. While many animals play, human play is distinguished by the sheer diversity of goals that we pursue, even as adults. Yet the seeming inutility of play belies one of the hallmarks of intelligence: a remarkably flexible ability to reason and plan in novel situations. What kind of mind generates and pursues so many goals, and has so much fun in the process? In this dissertation, I suggest that answering this question requires us to go beyond current accounts of rational action and exploration. To map out the path forward I present three lines of research involving behavioral experiments with young children (ages four to six years) and adult comparisons. In study one I find that adults and children endorse speculative conjectures, even when implausible or lacking evidence, because we primarily evaluate novel proposals based on how well it answers our questions. In study two I demonstrate that children at play spontaneously take unnecessarily costly actions and pursue prima facie inefficient plans, even though they minimize costs when achieving similar goals in non-play contexts. Finally, study three demonstrates that adults and children value their goals from the moment they are chosen: participants stick with their goals even when less costly alternatives are available. On their own, each study contributes novel empirical findings and theoretical insights to their respective literature in explanation, play, and planning. Taken together however, they suggest a broader conclusion: that humans treat goals as valuable constraints for reasoning and decision-making. By paying attention to the goals we adopt and the problems we make for ourselves, we may explain much more of the richness and flexibility of the human mind. Ph.D. 2023-10-30T20:03:13Z 2023-10-30T20:03:13Z 2023-06 2023-10-17T14:43:10.739Z Thesis https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/152563 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2778-6317 In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted Copyright retained by author(s) https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/ application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Chu, Junyi
Goals, Play, and Cognitive Pragmatism: A study of flexible human minds
title Goals, Play, and Cognitive Pragmatism: A study of flexible human minds
title_full Goals, Play, and Cognitive Pragmatism: A study of flexible human minds
title_fullStr Goals, Play, and Cognitive Pragmatism: A study of flexible human minds
title_full_unstemmed Goals, Play, and Cognitive Pragmatism: A study of flexible human minds
title_short Goals, Play, and Cognitive Pragmatism: A study of flexible human minds
title_sort goals play and cognitive pragmatism a study of flexible human minds
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/152563
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2778-6317
work_keys_str_mv AT chujunyi goalsplayandcognitivepragmatismastudyofflexiblehumanminds