Data Refusal From Below: A Framework for Understanding, Evaluating, and Envisioning Refusal as Design

Amidst calls for public accountability over large data-driven systems, feminist and indigenous scholars have developed refusal as a practice that challenges the authority of data collectors. However, because data affects so many aspects of daily life, it can be hard to see seemingly different refusa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zong, Jonathan, Matias, J Nathan
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: ACM 2023
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/152919
_version_ 1824458055039844352
author Zong, Jonathan
Matias, J Nathan
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Zong, Jonathan
Matias, J Nathan
author_sort Zong, Jonathan
collection MIT
description Amidst calls for public accountability over large data-driven systems, feminist and indigenous scholars have developed refusal as a practice that challenges the authority of data collectors. However, because data affects so many aspects of daily life, it can be hard to see seemingly different refusal strategies as part of the same repertoire. Furthermore, conversations about refusal often happen from the standpoint of designers and policymakers rather than the people and communities most affected by data collection. In this paper, we introduce a framework for data refusal from below—writing from the standpoint of people who refuse, rather than the institutions that seek their compliance. Because refusers work to reshape socio-technical systems, we argue that refusal is an act of design, and that design-based frameworks and methods can contribute to refusal. We characterize refusal strategies across four constituent facets common to all refusal, whatever strategies are used: autonomy, or how refusal accounts for individual and collective interests; time, or whether refusal reacts to past harm or proactively prevents future harm; power, or the extent to which refusal makes change possible; and cost, or whether or not refusal can reduce or redistribute penalties experienced by refusers. We illustrate each facet by drawing on cases of people and collectives that have refused data systems. Together, the four facets of our framework are designed to help scholars and activists describe, evaluate, and imagine new forms of refusal.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:12:00Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/152919
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-19T04:19:48Z
publishDate 2023
publisher ACM
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1529192024-12-21T05:44:55Z Data Refusal From Below: A Framework for Understanding, Evaluating, and Envisioning Refusal as Design Zong, Jonathan Matias, J Nathan Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Amidst calls for public accountability over large data-driven systems, feminist and indigenous scholars have developed refusal as a practice that challenges the authority of data collectors. However, because data affects so many aspects of daily life, it can be hard to see seemingly different refusal strategies as part of the same repertoire. Furthermore, conversations about refusal often happen from the standpoint of designers and policymakers rather than the people and communities most affected by data collection. In this paper, we introduce a framework for data refusal from below—writing from the standpoint of people who refuse, rather than the institutions that seek their compliance. Because refusers work to reshape socio-technical systems, we argue that refusal is an act of design, and that design-based frameworks and methods can contribute to refusal. We characterize refusal strategies across four constituent facets common to all refusal, whatever strategies are used: autonomy, or how refusal accounts for individual and collective interests; time, or whether refusal reacts to past harm or proactively prevents future harm; power, or the extent to which refusal makes change possible; and cost, or whether or not refusal can reduce or redistribute penalties experienced by refusers. We illustrate each facet by drawing on cases of people and collectives that have refused data systems. Together, the four facets of our framework are designed to help scholars and activists describe, evaluate, and imagine new forms of refusal. 2023-11-06T19:26:53Z 2023-11-06T19:26:53Z 2023-11-01T07:58:50Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 2832-0565 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/152919 Zong, Jonathan and Matias, J Nathan. "Data Refusal From Below: A Framework for Understanding, Evaluating, and Envisioning Refusal as Design." ACM Journal on Responsible Computing. en https://doi.org/10.1145/3630107 ACM Journal on Responsible Computing Creative Commons Attribution https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ The author(s) application/pdf ACM Association for Computing Machinery
spellingShingle Zong, Jonathan
Matias, J Nathan
Data Refusal From Below: A Framework for Understanding, Evaluating, and Envisioning Refusal as Design
title Data Refusal From Below: A Framework for Understanding, Evaluating, and Envisioning Refusal as Design
title_full Data Refusal From Below: A Framework for Understanding, Evaluating, and Envisioning Refusal as Design
title_fullStr Data Refusal From Below: A Framework for Understanding, Evaluating, and Envisioning Refusal as Design
title_full_unstemmed Data Refusal From Below: A Framework for Understanding, Evaluating, and Envisioning Refusal as Design
title_short Data Refusal From Below: A Framework for Understanding, Evaluating, and Envisioning Refusal as Design
title_sort data refusal from below a framework for understanding evaluating and envisioning refusal as design
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/152919
work_keys_str_mv AT zongjonathan datarefusalfrombelowaframeworkforunderstandingevaluatingandenvisioningrefusalasdesign
AT matiasjnathan datarefusalfrombelowaframeworkforunderstandingevaluatingandenvisioningrefusalasdesign