A cross-scale framework for evaluating flexibility values of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles
Flexibility has become increasingly important considering the intermittency of variable renewable energy in low-carbon energy systems. Electrified transportation exhibits great potential to provide flexibility. This article analyzed and compared the flexibility values of battery electric vehicles an...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
2024
|
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/154279 |
_version_ | 1824458219138842624 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Ruixue He, Guannan Wang, Xizhe Mallapragada, Dharik Zhao, Hongbo Shao-Horn, Yang Jiang, Benben |
author2 | MIT Energy Initiative |
author_facet | MIT Energy Initiative Liu, Ruixue He, Guannan Wang, Xizhe Mallapragada, Dharik Zhao, Hongbo Shao-Horn, Yang Jiang, Benben |
author_sort | Liu, Ruixue |
collection | MIT |
description | Flexibility has become increasingly important considering the intermittency of variable renewable energy in low-carbon energy systems. Electrified transportation exhibits great potential to provide flexibility. This article analyzed and compared the flexibility values of battery electric vehicles and fuel cell electric vehicles for planning and operating interdependent electricity and hydrogen supply chains while considering battery degradation costs. A cross-scale framework involving both macro-level and micro-level models was proposed to compute the profits of flexible EV refueling/charging with battery degradation considered. Here we show that the flexibility reduction after considering battery degradation is quantified by at least 4.7% of the minimum system cost and enlarged under fast charging and low-temperature scenarios. Our findings imply that energy policies and relevant management technologies are crucial to shaping the comparative flexibility advantage of the two transportation electrification pathways. The proposed cross-scale methodology has broad implications for the assessment of emerging energy technologies with complex dynamics. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T13:22:12Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/154279 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2025-02-19T04:22:24Z |
publishDate | 2024 |
publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/1542792025-01-07T04:39:43Z A cross-scale framework for evaluating flexibility values of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles Liu, Ruixue He, Guannan Wang, Xizhe Mallapragada, Dharik Zhao, Hongbo Shao-Horn, Yang Jiang, Benben MIT Energy Initiative Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering Flexibility has become increasingly important considering the intermittency of variable renewable energy in low-carbon energy systems. Electrified transportation exhibits great potential to provide flexibility. This article analyzed and compared the flexibility values of battery electric vehicles and fuel cell electric vehicles for planning and operating interdependent electricity and hydrogen supply chains while considering battery degradation costs. A cross-scale framework involving both macro-level and micro-level models was proposed to compute the profits of flexible EV refueling/charging with battery degradation considered. Here we show that the flexibility reduction after considering battery degradation is quantified by at least 4.7% of the minimum system cost and enlarged under fast charging and low-temperature scenarios. Our findings imply that energy policies and relevant management technologies are crucial to shaping the comparative flexibility advantage of the two transportation electrification pathways. The proposed cross-scale methodology has broad implications for the assessment of emerging energy technologies with complex dynamics. 2024-04-25T13:31:50Z 2024-04-25T13:31:50Z 2024-01-04 2024-04-25T13:27:51Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 2041-1723 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/154279 Liu, R., He, G., Wang, X. et al. A cross-scale framework for evaluating flexibility values of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles. Nat Commun 15, 280 (2024). en 10.1038/s41467-023-43884-x Nature Communications Creative Commons Attribution https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf Springer Science and Business Media LLC Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
spellingShingle | Liu, Ruixue He, Guannan Wang, Xizhe Mallapragada, Dharik Zhao, Hongbo Shao-Horn, Yang Jiang, Benben A cross-scale framework for evaluating flexibility values of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles |
title | A cross-scale framework for evaluating flexibility values of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles |
title_full | A cross-scale framework for evaluating flexibility values of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles |
title_fullStr | A cross-scale framework for evaluating flexibility values of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles |
title_full_unstemmed | A cross-scale framework for evaluating flexibility values of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles |
title_short | A cross-scale framework for evaluating flexibility values of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles |
title_sort | cross scale framework for evaluating flexibility values of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/154279 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuruixue acrossscaleframeworkforevaluatingflexibilityvaluesofbatteryandfuelcellelectricvehicles AT heguannan acrossscaleframeworkforevaluatingflexibilityvaluesofbatteryandfuelcellelectricvehicles AT wangxizhe acrossscaleframeworkforevaluatingflexibilityvaluesofbatteryandfuelcellelectricvehicles AT mallapragadadharik acrossscaleframeworkforevaluatingflexibilityvaluesofbatteryandfuelcellelectricvehicles AT zhaohongbo acrossscaleframeworkforevaluatingflexibilityvaluesofbatteryandfuelcellelectricvehicles AT shaohornyang acrossscaleframeworkforevaluatingflexibilityvaluesofbatteryandfuelcellelectricvehicles AT jiangbenben acrossscaleframeworkforevaluatingflexibilityvaluesofbatteryandfuelcellelectricvehicles AT liuruixue crossscaleframeworkforevaluatingflexibilityvaluesofbatteryandfuelcellelectricvehicles AT heguannan crossscaleframeworkforevaluatingflexibilityvaluesofbatteryandfuelcellelectricvehicles AT wangxizhe crossscaleframeworkforevaluatingflexibilityvaluesofbatteryandfuelcellelectricvehicles AT mallapragadadharik crossscaleframeworkforevaluatingflexibilityvaluesofbatteryandfuelcellelectricvehicles AT zhaohongbo crossscaleframeworkforevaluatingflexibilityvaluesofbatteryandfuelcellelectricvehicles AT shaohornyang crossscaleframeworkforevaluatingflexibilityvaluesofbatteryandfuelcellelectricvehicles AT jiangbenben crossscaleframeworkforevaluatingflexibilityvaluesofbatteryandfuelcellelectricvehicles |