The medium is the message: toxicity declines in structured vs unstructured online deliberations
Humanity needs to deliberate effectively at scale about highly complex and contentious problems. Current online deliberation tools—such as email, chatrooms, and forums—are however plagued by levels of discussion toxicity that deeply undercut the willingness and ability of the participants to engage...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
2024
|
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/154928 |
_version_ | 1824458100603617280 |
---|---|
author | Klein, Mark Majdoubi, Nouhayla |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Collective Intelligence |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Collective Intelligence Klein, Mark Majdoubi, Nouhayla |
author_sort | Klein, Mark |
collection | MIT |
description | Humanity needs to deliberate effectively at scale about highly complex and contentious problems. Current online deliberation tools—such as email, chatrooms, and forums—are however plagued by levels of discussion toxicity that deeply undercut the willingness and ability of the participants to engage in thoughtful, meaningful, deliberations. This has led many organizations to either shut down their forums or invest in expensive, frequently unreliable, and ethically fraught moderation of people's contributions in their forums. This paper includes a comprehensive review on online toxicity, and describes how a structured deliberation process can substantially reduce toxicity compared to current approaches. The key underlying insight is that unstructured conversations create, especially at scale, an “attention wars” dynamic wherein people are often incented to resort to extremified language in order to get visibility for their postings. A structured deliberation process wherein people collaboratively create a compact organized collection of answers and arguments removes this underlying incentive, and results, in our evaluation, in a 50% reduction of high-toxicity posts. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T11:35:28Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/154928 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2025-02-19T04:20:31Z |
publishDate | 2024 |
publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/1549282025-01-04T05:54:22Z The medium is the message: toxicity declines in structured vs unstructured online deliberations Klein, Mark Majdoubi, Nouhayla Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Collective Intelligence Humanity needs to deliberate effectively at scale about highly complex and contentious problems. Current online deliberation tools—such as email, chatrooms, and forums—are however plagued by levels of discussion toxicity that deeply undercut the willingness and ability of the participants to engage in thoughtful, meaningful, deliberations. This has led many organizations to either shut down their forums or invest in expensive, frequently unreliable, and ethically fraught moderation of people's contributions in their forums. This paper includes a comprehensive review on online toxicity, and describes how a structured deliberation process can substantially reduce toxicity compared to current approaches. The key underlying insight is that unstructured conversations create, especially at scale, an “attention wars” dynamic wherein people are often incented to resort to extremified language in order to get visibility for their postings. A structured deliberation process wherein people collaboratively create a compact organized collection of answers and arguments removes this underlying incentive, and results, in our evaluation, in a 50% reduction of high-toxicity posts. 2024-05-13T16:18:09Z 2024-05-13T16:18:09Z 2024-05 2024-05-12T03:11:48Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle 1386-145X 1573-1413 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/154928 Klein, M., Majdoubi, N. The medium is the message: toxicity declines in structured vs unstructured online deliberations. World Wide Web 27, 31 (2024). PUBLISHER_CC en 10.1007/s11280-024-01269-0 World Wide Web Creative Commons Attribution https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ The Author(s) application/pdf Springer Science and Business Media LLC Springer US |
spellingShingle | Klein, Mark Majdoubi, Nouhayla The medium is the message: toxicity declines in structured vs unstructured online deliberations |
title | The medium is the message: toxicity declines in structured vs unstructured online deliberations |
title_full | The medium is the message: toxicity declines in structured vs unstructured online deliberations |
title_fullStr | The medium is the message: toxicity declines in structured vs unstructured online deliberations |
title_full_unstemmed | The medium is the message: toxicity declines in structured vs unstructured online deliberations |
title_short | The medium is the message: toxicity declines in structured vs unstructured online deliberations |
title_sort | medium is the message toxicity declines in structured vs unstructured online deliberations |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/154928 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kleinmark themediumisthemessagetoxicitydeclinesinstructuredvsunstructuredonlinedeliberations AT majdoubinouhayla themediumisthemessagetoxicitydeclinesinstructuredvsunstructuredonlinedeliberations AT kleinmark mediumisthemessagetoxicitydeclinesinstructuredvsunstructuredonlinedeliberations AT majdoubinouhayla mediumisthemessagetoxicitydeclinesinstructuredvsunstructuredonlinedeliberations |