On the Implications of Choosing Average versus Marginal Carbon Intensity Signals on Carbon-aware Optimizations

E-Energy ’24, June 04–07, 2024, Singapore, Singapore

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sukprasert, Thanathorn, Bashir, Noman, Souza, Abel, Irwin, David, Shenoy, Prashant
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: ACM|The 15th ACM International Conference on Future and Sustainable Energy Systems 2024
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/155786
_version_ 1811096139565367296
author Sukprasert, Thanathorn
Bashir, Noman
Souza, Abel
Irwin, David
Shenoy, Prashant
author_facet Sukprasert, Thanathorn
Bashir, Noman
Souza, Abel
Irwin, David
Shenoy, Prashant
author_sort Sukprasert, Thanathorn
collection MIT
description E-Energy ’24, June 04–07, 2024, Singapore, Singapore
first_indexed 2024-09-23T16:38:47Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/155786
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-24T16:37:52Z
publishDate 2024
publisher ACM|The 15th ACM International Conference on Future and Sustainable Energy Systems
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1557862024-09-23T04:08:01Z On the Implications of Choosing Average versus Marginal Carbon Intensity Signals on Carbon-aware Optimizations Sukprasert, Thanathorn Bashir, Noman Souza, Abel Irwin, David Shenoy, Prashant E-Energy ’24, June 04–07, 2024, Singapore, Singapore The carbon intensity of grid-supplied electricity depends on the mix of generation sources used to satisfy its demand and varies widely over time and across locations. There are two types of carbon intensity signals: average and marginal. Both signals provide distinct information about grid operations and affect the electric grid’s short- and long-term functioning in different ways. Unfortunately, there is a lack of consensus on the “right” signal for carbon-aware optimizations, and decarbonization efforts across domains have used both signals to decide when and where to shift demand. To understand the implications of signal selection on carbon-aware optimizations, this paper performs a data-driven analysis using both the average and marginal carbon intensity. Our analysis for 65 regions reveals multiple insights, including i) both signals are statistically different with very low correlation between them, ii) optimizing for one signal could lead to more carbon emissions from the other signal’s standpoint, and iii) differences in signal characteristics in each region lead to different electricity use incentives. 2024-07-24T18:49:01Z 2024-07-24T18:49:01Z 2024-05-31 2024-06-01T07:55:43Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaper 979-8-4007-0480-2 https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/155786 Sukprasert, Thanathorn, Bashir, Noman, Souza, Abel, Irwin, David and Shenoy, Prashant. 2024. "On the Implications of Choosing Average versus Marginal Carbon Intensity Signals on Carbon-aware Optimizations." PUBLISHER_CC en 10.1145/3632775.3661953 Creative Commons Attribution https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ The author(s) application/pdf ACM|The 15th ACM International Conference on Future and Sustainable Energy Systems Association for Computing Machinery
spellingShingle Sukprasert, Thanathorn
Bashir, Noman
Souza, Abel
Irwin, David
Shenoy, Prashant
On the Implications of Choosing Average versus Marginal Carbon Intensity Signals on Carbon-aware Optimizations
title On the Implications of Choosing Average versus Marginal Carbon Intensity Signals on Carbon-aware Optimizations
title_full On the Implications of Choosing Average versus Marginal Carbon Intensity Signals on Carbon-aware Optimizations
title_fullStr On the Implications of Choosing Average versus Marginal Carbon Intensity Signals on Carbon-aware Optimizations
title_full_unstemmed On the Implications of Choosing Average versus Marginal Carbon Intensity Signals on Carbon-aware Optimizations
title_short On the Implications of Choosing Average versus Marginal Carbon Intensity Signals on Carbon-aware Optimizations
title_sort on the implications of choosing average versus marginal carbon intensity signals on carbon aware optimizations
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/155786
work_keys_str_mv AT sukprasertthanathorn ontheimplicationsofchoosingaverageversusmarginalcarbonintensitysignalsoncarbonawareoptimizations
AT bashirnoman ontheimplicationsofchoosingaverageversusmarginalcarbonintensitysignalsoncarbonawareoptimizations
AT souzaabel ontheimplicationsofchoosingaverageversusmarginalcarbonintensitysignalsoncarbonawareoptimizations
AT irwindavid ontheimplicationsofchoosingaverageversusmarginalcarbonintensitysignalsoncarbonawareoptimizations
AT shenoyprashant ontheimplicationsofchoosingaverageversusmarginalcarbonintensitysignalsoncarbonawareoptimizations