Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health continues a trajectory of U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence that undermines the normative foundation of public health — the idea that the state is obligated to provide a robust set of supports for healthcare services and the underlying social determinants of health. Do...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2024
|
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/156167 |
_version_ | 1811075285650505728 |
---|---|
author | Ahmed, Aziza Evans, Dabney P Jackson, Jason Meier, Benjamin Mason Tomori, Cecília |
author2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning |
author_facet | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning Ahmed, Aziza Evans, Dabney P Jackson, Jason Meier, Benjamin Mason Tomori, Cecília |
author_sort | Ahmed, Aziza |
collection | MIT |
description | Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health continues a trajectory of U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence that undermines the normative foundation of public health — the idea that the state is obligated to provide a robust set of supports for healthcare services and the underlying social determinants of health. Dobbs furthers a longstanding ideology of individual responsibility in public health, neglecting collective responsibility for better health outcomes. Such an ideology on individual responsibility not only enables a shrinking of public health infrastructure for reproductive health, it facilitates the rise of reproductive coercion and a criminal legal response to pregnancy and abortion. This commentary situates Dobbs in the context of a long historical shift in public health that increasingly places burdens on individuals for their own reproductive health care, moving away from the possibility of a robust state public health infrastructure. |
first_indexed | 2024-09-23T10:03:39Z |
format | Article |
id | mit-1721.1/156167 |
institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-09-23T10:03:39Z |
publishDate | 2024 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | mit-1721.1/1561672024-09-19T15:43:35Z Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion Ahmed, Aziza Evans, Dabney P Jackson, Jason Meier, Benjamin Mason Tomori, Cecília Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health continues a trajectory of U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence that undermines the normative foundation of public health — the idea that the state is obligated to provide a robust set of supports for healthcare services and the underlying social determinants of health. Dobbs furthers a longstanding ideology of individual responsibility in public health, neglecting collective responsibility for better health outcomes. Such an ideology on individual responsibility not only enables a shrinking of public health infrastructure for reproductive health, it facilitates the rise of reproductive coercion and a criminal legal response to pregnancy and abortion. This commentary situates Dobbs in the context of a long historical shift in public health that increasingly places burdens on individuals for their own reproductive health care, moving away from the possibility of a robust state public health infrastructure. 2024-08-14T20:29:32Z 2024-08-14T20:29:32Z 2023 2024-08-14T20:19:43Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/156167 Ahmed A, Evans DP, Jackson J, Meier BM, Tomori C. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2023;51(3):485-489. en 10.1017/jme.2023.137 Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Creative Commons Attribution https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press |
spellingShingle | Ahmed, Aziza Evans, Dabney P Jackson, Jason Meier, Benjamin Mason Tomori, Cecília Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion |
title | Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion |
title_full | Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion |
title_fullStr | Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion |
title_full_unstemmed | Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion |
title_short | Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion |
title_sort | dobbs v jackson women s health undermining public health facilitating reproductive coercion |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/156167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmedaziza dobbsvjacksonwomenshealthunderminingpublichealthfacilitatingreproductivecoercion AT evansdabneyp dobbsvjacksonwomenshealthunderminingpublichealthfacilitatingreproductivecoercion AT jacksonjason dobbsvjacksonwomenshealthunderminingpublichealthfacilitatingreproductivecoercion AT meierbenjaminmason dobbsvjacksonwomenshealthunderminingpublichealthfacilitatingreproductivecoercion AT tomoricecilia dobbsvjacksonwomenshealthunderminingpublichealthfacilitatingreproductivecoercion |