Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health continues a trajectory of U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence that undermines the normative foundation of public health — the idea that the state is obligated to provide a robust set of supports for healthcare services and the underlying social determinants of health. Do...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed, Aziza, Evans, Dabney P, Jackson, Jason, Meier, Benjamin Mason, Tomori, Cecília
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2024
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/156167
_version_ 1811075285650505728
author Ahmed, Aziza
Evans, Dabney P
Jackson, Jason
Meier, Benjamin Mason
Tomori, Cecília
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
Ahmed, Aziza
Evans, Dabney P
Jackson, Jason
Meier, Benjamin Mason
Tomori, Cecília
author_sort Ahmed, Aziza
collection MIT
description Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health continues a trajectory of U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence that undermines the normative foundation of public health — the idea that the state is obligated to provide a robust set of supports for healthcare services and the underlying social determinants of health. Dobbs furthers a longstanding ideology of individual responsibility in public health, neglecting collective responsibility for better health outcomes. Such an ideology on individual responsibility not only enables a shrinking of public health infrastructure for reproductive health, it facilitates the rise of reproductive coercion and a criminal legal response to pregnancy and abortion. This commentary situates Dobbs in the context of a long historical shift in public health that increasingly places burdens on individuals for their own reproductive health care, moving away from the possibility of a robust state public health infrastructure.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:03:39Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/156167
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:03:39Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1561672024-09-19T15:43:35Z Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion Ahmed, Aziza Evans, Dabney P Jackson, Jason Meier, Benjamin Mason Tomori, Cecília Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health continues a trajectory of U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence that undermines the normative foundation of public health — the idea that the state is obligated to provide a robust set of supports for healthcare services and the underlying social determinants of health. Dobbs furthers a longstanding ideology of individual responsibility in public health, neglecting collective responsibility for better health outcomes. Such an ideology on individual responsibility not only enables a shrinking of public health infrastructure for reproductive health, it facilitates the rise of reproductive coercion and a criminal legal response to pregnancy and abortion. This commentary situates Dobbs in the context of a long historical shift in public health that increasingly places burdens on individuals for their own reproductive health care, moving away from the possibility of a robust state public health infrastructure. 2024-08-14T20:29:32Z 2024-08-14T20:29:32Z 2023 2024-08-14T20:19:43Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/156167 Ahmed A, Evans DP, Jackson J, Meier BM, Tomori C. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2023;51(3):485-489. en 10.1017/jme.2023.137 Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics Creative Commons Attribution https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press
spellingShingle Ahmed, Aziza
Evans, Dabney P
Jackson, Jason
Meier, Benjamin Mason
Tomori, Cecília
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion
title Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion
title_full Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion
title_fullStr Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion
title_full_unstemmed Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion
title_short Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Undermining Public Health, Facilitating Reproductive Coercion
title_sort dobbs v jackson women s health undermining public health facilitating reproductive coercion
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/156167
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedaziza dobbsvjacksonwomenshealthunderminingpublichealthfacilitatingreproductivecoercion
AT evansdabneyp dobbsvjacksonwomenshealthunderminingpublichealthfacilitatingreproductivecoercion
AT jacksonjason dobbsvjacksonwomenshealthunderminingpublichealthfacilitatingreproductivecoercion
AT meierbenjaminmason dobbsvjacksonwomenshealthunderminingpublichealthfacilitatingreproductivecoercion
AT tomoricecilia dobbsvjacksonwomenshealthunderminingpublichealthfacilitatingreproductivecoercion