Marsh restoration in front of seawalls is an economically justified nature-based solution for coastal protection

A marsh-fronted seawall is a hybrid nature-based coastal protection solution because it attenuates wave energy, reduces erosion, and provides ecosystem services. However, we still have a limited understanding of how to quantify the marsh wave attenuation benefits for economic analysis. Here, we inco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee, Ernie IH, Nepf, Heidi
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2025
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/158167
_version_ 1824458314739613696
author Lee, Ernie IH
Nepf, Heidi
author2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
author_facet Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Lee, Ernie IH
Nepf, Heidi
author_sort Lee, Ernie IH
collection MIT
description A marsh-fronted seawall is a hybrid nature-based coastal protection solution because it attenuates wave energy, reduces erosion, and provides ecosystem services. However, we still have a limited understanding of how to quantify the marsh wave attenuation benefits for economic analysis. Here, we incorporate a prediction of wave attenuation that accounts for species-specific morphology and structural stiffness into a 1-D wave model and validate it with field measurements. Our results show that the wave attenuation varies by a factor of two across different vegetation species. Further, we performed a benefit-cost analysis, in which the economic benefits represent the environmental services value and avoided seawall heightening cost that would otherwise be required to deliver the same overtopping rate without vegetation. We applied the model to a real-world, marsh-fronted seawall design at Juniper Cove, Massachusetts. Although the benefit of marsh-fronted seawalls is sensitive to discount rate, they have benefit-cost ratios greater than one, indicating that it is an economically justified nature-based solution. Further, we found that wave attenuation and benefit-cost ratio are more sensitive to water depth than wave height. Our study demonstrates the importance of considering the coastal protection of marshes and economic benefits in one framework.
first_indexed 2025-02-19T04:23:56Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/158167
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-19T04:23:56Z
publishDate 2025
publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/1581672025-02-04T16:44:36Z Marsh restoration in front of seawalls is an economically justified nature-based solution for coastal protection Lee, Ernie IH Nepf, Heidi Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering A marsh-fronted seawall is a hybrid nature-based coastal protection solution because it attenuates wave energy, reduces erosion, and provides ecosystem services. However, we still have a limited understanding of how to quantify the marsh wave attenuation benefits for economic analysis. Here, we incorporate a prediction of wave attenuation that accounts for species-specific morphology and structural stiffness into a 1-D wave model and validate it with field measurements. Our results show that the wave attenuation varies by a factor of two across different vegetation species. Further, we performed a benefit-cost analysis, in which the economic benefits represent the environmental services value and avoided seawall heightening cost that would otherwise be required to deliver the same overtopping rate without vegetation. We applied the model to a real-world, marsh-fronted seawall design at Juniper Cove, Massachusetts. Although the benefit of marsh-fronted seawalls is sensitive to discount rate, they have benefit-cost ratios greater than one, indicating that it is an economically justified nature-based solution. Further, we found that wave attenuation and benefit-cost ratio are more sensitive to water depth than wave height. Our study demonstrates the importance of considering the coastal protection of marshes and economic benefits in one framework. 2025-02-04T16:44:35Z 2025-02-04T16:44:35Z 2025-02-04T16:37:45Z Article http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/158167 Lee, E.I.H., Nepf, H. Marsh restoration in front of seawalls is an economically justified nature-based solution for coastal protection. Commun Earth Environ 5, 605 (2024). en 10.1038/s43247-024-01753-5 Communications Earth & Environment Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ application/pdf Springer Science and Business Media LLC Springer Science and Business Media LLC
spellingShingle Lee, Ernie IH
Nepf, Heidi
Marsh restoration in front of seawalls is an economically justified nature-based solution for coastal protection
title Marsh restoration in front of seawalls is an economically justified nature-based solution for coastal protection
title_full Marsh restoration in front of seawalls is an economically justified nature-based solution for coastal protection
title_fullStr Marsh restoration in front of seawalls is an economically justified nature-based solution for coastal protection
title_full_unstemmed Marsh restoration in front of seawalls is an economically justified nature-based solution for coastal protection
title_short Marsh restoration in front of seawalls is an economically justified nature-based solution for coastal protection
title_sort marsh restoration in front of seawalls is an economically justified nature based solution for coastal protection
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/158167
work_keys_str_mv AT leeernieih marshrestorationinfrontofseawallsisaneconomicallyjustifiednaturebasedsolutionforcoastalprotection
AT nepfheidi marshrestorationinfrontofseawallsisaneconomicallyjustifiednaturebasedsolutionforcoastalprotection