Incentive Effects of Promotions on Employee Participation: The Case of Korean Auto Workers
In the tournament games only the winner can advance to the next rounds of competition. The important feature of tournament is that the reward is based on the rank order among competitors rather than absolute level of their performances. This type of reward system can be widely found in competiti...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Language: | en_US |
| Published: |
2002
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1642 |
| _version_ | 1826196048390914048 |
|---|---|
| author | Lee, Daechang |
| author_facet | Lee, Daechang |
| author_sort | Lee, Daechang |
| collection | MIT |
| description | In the tournament games only the winner can advance to the next rounds
of competition. The important feature of tournament is that the reward is
based on the rank order among competitors rather than absolute level of
their performances. This type of reward system can be widely found in
competition for promotion in business organizations. For example, many
hourly workers in manufacturing plants compete for a limited number of
supervisory positions; a number of vice presidents in a firm strive for one
coveted position of president.
The employee participation in improvement activities have been thought
of as one of the best practices taken in many auto plants around the world.
So we can find auto firms often evaluating their workers on the basis of
how good performances they show in off-line activities such as suggestions
and QC circles. Or at least it is one of many evaluating items. Since the
opportunity of promotions is limited but often known to production
workers in advance, it may be regarded as prizes open to candidates.
Tournament theory shows that compensation based on relative order can
give participants an incentive to provide an optimal level of efforts under
certain a set of assumptions. It is often argued that the optimal level of
efforts depend positively on the price differential for winning the game.
There has been many studies to analyze the benefits and costs that
employee participation activities can give individual workers [Cooke
(1990)]. However, few attempts have been made to test if promotion
tournaments can induce workers to involve more actively in employee
participation. In this study I seek to test the incentive effects of
promotion using data from a survey of Korean auto plants. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-23T10:20:01Z |
| id | mit-1721.1/1642 |
| institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| language | en_US |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-23T10:20:01Z |
| publishDate | 2002 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | mit-1721.1/16422019-04-12T08:09:56Z Incentive Effects of Promotions on Employee Participation: The Case of Korean Auto Workers Lee, Daechang Korea auto plants manufacturing incentive promotion employee participation In the tournament games only the winner can advance to the next rounds of competition. The important feature of tournament is that the reward is based on the rank order among competitors rather than absolute level of their performances. This type of reward system can be widely found in competition for promotion in business organizations. For example, many hourly workers in manufacturing plants compete for a limited number of supervisory positions; a number of vice presidents in a firm strive for one coveted position of president. The employee participation in improvement activities have been thought of as one of the best practices taken in many auto plants around the world. So we can find auto firms often evaluating their workers on the basis of how good performances they show in off-line activities such as suggestions and QC circles. Or at least it is one of many evaluating items. Since the opportunity of promotions is limited but often known to production workers in advance, it may be regarded as prizes open to candidates. Tournament theory shows that compensation based on relative order can give participants an incentive to provide an optimal level of efforts under certain a set of assumptions. It is often argued that the optimal level of efforts depend positively on the price differential for winning the game. There has been many studies to analyze the benefits and costs that employee participation activities can give individual workers [Cooke (1990)]. However, few attempts have been made to test if promotion tournaments can induce workers to involve more actively in employee participation. In this study I seek to test the incentive effects of promotion using data from a survey of Korean auto plants. 2002-09-10T19:01:37Z 2002-09-10T19:01:37Z 1995-06 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1642 en_US 56110 bytes application/pdf application/pdf |
| spellingShingle | Korea auto plants manufacturing incentive promotion employee participation Lee, Daechang Incentive Effects of Promotions on Employee Participation: The Case of Korean Auto Workers |
| title | Incentive Effects of Promotions on Employee Participation: The Case of Korean Auto Workers |
| title_full | Incentive Effects of Promotions on Employee Participation: The Case of Korean Auto Workers |
| title_fullStr | Incentive Effects of Promotions on Employee Participation: The Case of Korean Auto Workers |
| title_full_unstemmed | Incentive Effects of Promotions on Employee Participation: The Case of Korean Auto Workers |
| title_short | Incentive Effects of Promotions on Employee Participation: The Case of Korean Auto Workers |
| title_sort | incentive effects of promotions on employee participation the case of korean auto workers |
| topic | Korea auto plants manufacturing incentive promotion employee participation |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1642 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT leedaechang incentiveeffectsofpromotionsonemployeeparticipationthecaseofkoreanautoworkers |