Sei'ichi Shirai and subjective method of synthesis

Thesis (M.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1988.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nagaya, Toshiaki
Other Authors: David Friedman.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/17223
_version_ 1811080745026846720
author Nagaya, Toshiaki
author2 David Friedman.
author_facet David Friedman.
Nagaya, Toshiaki
author_sort Nagaya, Toshiaki
collection MIT
description Thesis (M.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1988.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:36:05Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/17223
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T11:36:05Z
publishDate 2005
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/172232019-04-10T09:31:30Z Sei'ichi Shirai and subjective method of synthesis Nagaya, Toshiaki David Friedman. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture. Architecture. Thesis (M.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1988. Bibliography: leaves 96-98. If modernism in architecture is based on a rational, objective approach, Sei'ichi Shirai was a unique architect who created his own subjective value system, which resulted in isolating him from the modern movement. Educated both in Japan and in Europe, Shirai incorporated what he saw as the existential quality of western architecture into his own original designs. His subjective judgement guided the choice of trans-cultural and transhistorical architectural elements, and arranged them in a dialectic manner. This thesis examines Shirai's designs in the terms of their internal conflicts with tradition, such as those of Egypt and Greece, Shintoism and Buddhism, Jo-mon and Yayoi, and stone masonry and wood carpentry. The attitude was quite different from that of so-called modern architects, since Shirai did not deal with systematic spatial integration. Shirai's architecture emerged like an inevitable creation that was destined to exist. As a result, proponents of modernism who think of architecture in the context of the environment and who create space analytically in terms of functions and compositions, failed to appreciate his efforts. His work has the quality of so-called Post Modern architecture already in the 1950s, but his insights, being too early, failed to win him wide recognition. by Toshiaki Nagaya. M.S. 2005-06-02T13:47:38Z 2005-06-02T13:47:38Z 1988 1988 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/17223 18551875 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 201 leaves 18420263 bytes 18448568 bytes application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Architecture.
Nagaya, Toshiaki
Sei'ichi Shirai and subjective method of synthesis
title Sei'ichi Shirai and subjective method of synthesis
title_full Sei'ichi Shirai and subjective method of synthesis
title_fullStr Sei'ichi Shirai and subjective method of synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Sei'ichi Shirai and subjective method of synthesis
title_short Sei'ichi Shirai and subjective method of synthesis
title_sort sei ichi shirai and subjective method of synthesis
topic Architecture.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/17223
work_keys_str_mv AT nagayatoshiaki seiichishiraiandsubjectivemethodofsynthesis