Bureaucratic flexibility : large organizations and the restructuring of physician careers

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2003.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Briscoe, Forrest
Other Authors: Thomas A. Kochan.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/17603
_version_ 1826203962371473408
author Briscoe, Forrest
author2 Thomas A. Kochan.
author_facet Thomas A. Kochan.
Briscoe, Forrest
author_sort Briscoe, Forrest
collection MIT
description Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2003.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T12:46:40Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/17603
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T12:46:40Z
publishDate 2005
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/176032019-04-11T08:57:11Z Bureaucratic flexibility : large organizations and the restructuring of physician careers gift of time : large organizations, new demographics, and the restructuring of physician time Briscoe, Forrest Thomas A. Kochan. Sloan School of Management. Sloan School of Management. Sloan School of Management. Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2003. Includes bibliographical references (p. 195-206). This thesis contributes to theory and research at the intersection of professions, labor markets, and careers. To do so, it draws on longitudinal and cross-sectional data on physicians in different organizational arrangements. Physicians have been migrating into larger medical practice organizations over the past three decades, creating a valuable research opportunity. Previous writing on the professions and on careers implies that large, bureaucratic organizations constrain autonomy and are therefore anathema to professionals. Instead, I observe that many physicians find these larger structures to be emancipating because such organizations provide unique access to highly-valued career options. These career options are possible because large organizations have scale and systems that address a fundamental temporal problem for doctors: availability whenever the patient requires attention. With a pool of substitutes for the individual physician, and systems that facilitate patient hand-offs, the large organization offers a predictable schedule and moderate hours when compared with traditional private practice. As a result, large organizations open up an expanded portfolio of career options, including part-time clinician, and facilitate transitions between different roles. These career options are greatly valued within the current physician workforce, particularly among the growing ranks of female physicians and those physicians in dual-career families. The dissertation is organized into three papers. The first paper asks which types of physicians are employed in large organizations, testing two competing accounts from professions theory and careers research using national survey data. (cont.) The second paper uses a longitudinal survey conducted by the author in order to investigate how different career options are utilized over time within one large medical practice organization. Finally, the third paper draws on detailed interview data from that same setting to document how the large organization enables schedule restructuring and, as a consequence, provides an expanded range of career options. Taken together, this work contributes to a new understanding of professionals, one that emphasizes heterogeneity in career interests and the possibility of meeting those interests through individually-tailored careers inside large organizations. By neglecting this individual heterogeneity, we risk assuming that the movement of professionals into large organizations will result only in dispirited practice. In contrast, through the lens of career diversity, bureaucracies actually take on a liberating character for many doctors. Similarly, while the careers literature has emphasized the flexibility of independent practice arrangements, I find physicians to value bureaucratic employment precisely because it accommodates their temporal career interests. by Forrest Scott Briscoe. Ph.D. 2005-06-02T16:21:40Z 2005-06-02T16:21:40Z 2003 2003 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/17603 53484026 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 206 p. 9871720 bytes 9871527 bytes application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Sloan School of Management.
Briscoe, Forrest
Bureaucratic flexibility : large organizations and the restructuring of physician careers
title Bureaucratic flexibility : large organizations and the restructuring of physician careers
title_full Bureaucratic flexibility : large organizations and the restructuring of physician careers
title_fullStr Bureaucratic flexibility : large organizations and the restructuring of physician careers
title_full_unstemmed Bureaucratic flexibility : large organizations and the restructuring of physician careers
title_short Bureaucratic flexibility : large organizations and the restructuring of physician careers
title_sort bureaucratic flexibility large organizations and the restructuring of physician careers
topic Sloan School of Management.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/17603
work_keys_str_mv AT briscoeforrest bureaucraticflexibilitylargeorganizationsandtherestructuringofphysiciancareers
AT briscoeforrest giftoftimelargeorganizationsnewdemographicsandtherestructuringofphysiciantime