ON TREES AND LOGS

In this paper we critically examine the main workhorse model in asset pricing theory, the Lucas (1978) tree model (LT-Model), extended to include heterogeneous agents and multiple goods, and contrast it to the benchmark model in financi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cass, David, Pavlova, Anna
Format: Working Paper
Language:en_US
Published: 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1809
_version_ 1811097136702423040
author Cass, David
Pavlova, Anna
author_facet Cass, David
Pavlova, Anna
author_sort Cass, David
collection MIT
description In this paper we critically examine the main workhorse model in asset pricing theory, the Lucas (1978) tree model (LT-Model), extended to include heterogeneous agents and multiple goods, and contrast it to the benchmark model in financial equilibrium theory, the real assets model (RA-Model). Households in the LT-Model trade goods together with claims to Lucas trees (exogenous stochastic dividend streams specified in terms of a particular good) and long-lived, zero-net-supply real bonds, and are endowed with share portfolios. The RA-Model is quite similar to the LT-Model except that the only claims traded there are zero-net-supply assets paying out in terms of commodity bundles (real assets) and households' endowments are in terms of commodity bundles as well. At the outset, one would expect the two models to deliver similar implications since the LT-Model can be transformed into a special case of the RA-Model. We demonstrate that this is simply not correct: results obtained in the context of the LT-Model can be strikingly different from those in the RA-Model. Indeed, specializing households' preferences to be additively separable (over time) as well as log-linear, we show that for a large set of initial portfolios the LT-Model -- even with potentially complete financial markets -- admits a peculiar financial equilibrium (PFE) in which there is no trade on the bond market after the initial period, while the stock market is completely degenerate, in the sense that all stocks offer exactly the same investment opportunity -- and yet, allocation is Pareto optimal. We then thoroughly investigate why the LT-Model is so much at variance with the RA-Model, and also completely characterize the properties of the set of PFE, which turn out to be the only kind of equilibria occurring in this model. We also find that when a PFE exists, either (i) it is unique, or (ii) there is a continuum of equilibria: in fact, every Pareto optimal allocation is supported as a PFE. Finally, we show that most of our results continue to hold true in the presence of various types of restrictions on transactions in financial markets. Portfolio constraints however may give rise other types of equilibria, in addition to PFE. While our analysis is carried out in the framework of the traditional two-period Arrow-Debreu-McKenzie pure exchange model with uncertainty (encompassing, in particular, many types of contingent commodities), we show that most of our results hold for the analogous continuous-time martingale model of asset pricing
first_indexed 2024-09-23T16:54:54Z
format Working Paper
id mit-1721.1/1809
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T16:54:54Z
publishDate 2003
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/18092019-04-11T09:45:32Z ON TREES AND LOGS Cass, David Pavlova, Anna Lucas Tree Model Equilibrium Theory Peculiar Financial Equilibrium Nonuniqueness of Equilibria Portfolio Constraints In this paper we critically examine the main workhorse model in asset pricing theory, the Lucas (1978) tree model (LT-Model), extended to include heterogeneous agents and multiple goods, and contrast it to the benchmark model in financial equilibrium theory, the real assets model (RA-Model). Households in the LT-Model trade goods together with claims to Lucas trees (exogenous stochastic dividend streams specified in terms of a particular good) and long-lived, zero-net-supply real bonds, and are endowed with share portfolios. The RA-Model is quite similar to the LT-Model except that the only claims traded there are zero-net-supply assets paying out in terms of commodity bundles (real assets) and households' endowments are in terms of commodity bundles as well. At the outset, one would expect the two models to deliver similar implications since the LT-Model can be transformed into a special case of the RA-Model. We demonstrate that this is simply not correct: results obtained in the context of the LT-Model can be strikingly different from those in the RA-Model. Indeed, specializing households' preferences to be additively separable (over time) as well as log-linear, we show that for a large set of initial portfolios the LT-Model -- even with potentially complete financial markets -- admits a peculiar financial equilibrium (PFE) in which there is no trade on the bond market after the initial period, while the stock market is completely degenerate, in the sense that all stocks offer exactly the same investment opportunity -- and yet, allocation is Pareto optimal. We then thoroughly investigate why the LT-Model is so much at variance with the RA-Model, and also completely characterize the properties of the set of PFE, which turn out to be the only kind of equilibria occurring in this model. We also find that when a PFE exists, either (i) it is unique, or (ii) there is a continuum of equilibria: in fact, every Pareto optimal allocation is supported as a PFE. Finally, we show that most of our results continue to hold true in the presence of various types of restrictions on transactions in financial markets. Portfolio constraints however may give rise other types of equilibria, in addition to PFE. While our analysis is carried out in the framework of the traditional two-period Arrow-Debreu-McKenzie pure exchange model with uncertainty (encompassing, in particular, many types of contingent commodities), we show that most of our results hold for the analogous continuous-time martingale model of asset pricing 2003-01-27T21:12:56Z 2003-01-27T21:12:56Z 2003-01-27T21:12:56Z Working Paper http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1809 en_US MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper;4233-02 462067 bytes application/pdf application/pdf
spellingShingle Lucas Tree Model
Equilibrium Theory
Peculiar Financial Equilibrium
Nonuniqueness of Equilibria
Portfolio Constraints
Cass, David
Pavlova, Anna
ON TREES AND LOGS
title ON TREES AND LOGS
title_full ON TREES AND LOGS
title_fullStr ON TREES AND LOGS
title_full_unstemmed ON TREES AND LOGS
title_short ON TREES AND LOGS
title_sort on trees and logs
topic Lucas Tree Model
Equilibrium Theory
Peculiar Financial Equilibrium
Nonuniqueness of Equilibria
Portfolio Constraints
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1809
work_keys_str_mv AT cassdavid ontreesandlogs
AT pavlovaanna ontreesandlogs