Bridging the Reporting Gap: A Proposal for More Informative Reconciling of Book and Tax Income

In this paper we review the history and purpose of the corporation income tax return's Schedule M-1 in light of recent attention to corporate reporting issues. Although the traditional role for the schedule has been to assist the audit process, the reconciliation of book to tax accounting nu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Plesko, George, Mills, Lillian
Format: Working Paper
Language:en_US
Published: 2003
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1839
_version_ 1811077627474083840
author Plesko, George
Mills, Lillian
author_facet Plesko, George
Mills, Lillian
author_sort Plesko, George
collection MIT
description In this paper we review the history and purpose of the corporation income tax return's Schedule M-1 in light of recent attention to corporate reporting issues. Although the traditional role for the schedule has been to assist the audit process, the reconciliation of book to tax accounting numbers also provides information that is useful to tax analysts. We find the existing tax return Schedule M-1, largely unchanged since its introduction in 1963, provides insufficient detail for complex reconciliation issues. We propose a modified M- 1 to achieve better reconciliation, and discuss the advantages, and disadvantages, of public disclosure of such data
first_indexed 2024-09-23T10:46:02Z
format Working Paper
id mit-1721.1/1839
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T10:46:02Z
publishDate 2003
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/18392019-04-10T21:56:17Z Bridging the Reporting Gap: A Proposal for More Informative Reconciling of Book and Tax Income Plesko, George Mills, Lillian In this paper we review the history and purpose of the corporation income tax return's Schedule M-1 in light of recent attention to corporate reporting issues. Although the traditional role for the schedule has been to assist the audit process, the reconciliation of book to tax accounting numbers also provides information that is useful to tax analysts. We find the existing tax return Schedule M-1, largely unchanged since its introduction in 1963, provides insufficient detail for complex reconciliation issues. We propose a modified M- 1 to achieve better reconciliation, and discuss the advantages, and disadvantages, of public disclosure of such data 2003-03-14T20:38:13Z 2003-03-14T20:38:13Z 2003-03-14T20:38:13Z Working Paper http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1839 en_US MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper;4289-03 170392 bytes application/pdf application/pdf
spellingShingle Plesko, George
Mills, Lillian
Bridging the Reporting Gap: A Proposal for More Informative Reconciling of Book and Tax Income
title Bridging the Reporting Gap: A Proposal for More Informative Reconciling of Book and Tax Income
title_full Bridging the Reporting Gap: A Proposal for More Informative Reconciling of Book and Tax Income
title_fullStr Bridging the Reporting Gap: A Proposal for More Informative Reconciling of Book and Tax Income
title_full_unstemmed Bridging the Reporting Gap: A Proposal for More Informative Reconciling of Book and Tax Income
title_short Bridging the Reporting Gap: A Proposal for More Informative Reconciling of Book and Tax Income
title_sort bridging the reporting gap a proposal for more informative reconciling of book and tax income
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1839
work_keys_str_mv AT pleskogeorge bridgingthereportinggapaproposalformoreinformativereconcilingofbookandtaxincome
AT millslillian bridgingthereportinggapaproposalformoreinformativereconcilingofbookandtaxincome