Evaluating the costs and benefits of increased funding for public transportation in Chicago

Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2004.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schofield, Mark L., 1973-
Other Authors: Frederick P. Salvucci.
Format: Thesis
Language:en_US
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/28631
_version_ 1826208945532829696
author Schofield, Mark L., 1973-
author2 Frederick P. Salvucci.
author_facet Frederick P. Salvucci.
Schofield, Mark L., 1973-
author_sort Schofield, Mark L., 1973-
collection MIT
description Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2004.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:15:14Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/28631
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:15:14Z
publishDate 2005
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/286312019-04-11T10:47:23Z Evaluating the costs and benefits of increased funding for public transportation in Chicago Schofield, Mark L., 1973- Frederick P. Salvucci. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Civil and Environmental Engineering. Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2004. Includes bibliographical references (p. 117-119). (cont.) off-peak ridership, is at or slightly below break-even with respect to net benefits if the CTA cost structure and tax source of subsidy remains unchanged. In order to justify any significant additional long-term funding for the purpose of growing ridership, the CTA should make operational changes to lower its costs and should seek additional funding from sources with lower societal costs. The Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) faces an immediate financial crisis and a long-term struggle to maintain its role as a meaningful transportation provider in Chicago. Political and financial constraints will induce significant ridership losses in the near term unless additional operating funds are made available. Moreover, even if funding for current fares and service levels is maintained, the CTA risks a continuing decline in market share unless additional action is taken. This thesis investigates the costs and benefits of increased funding for the Chicago Transit Authority under various scenarios. First, it examines historical and political factors that have created the current tenuous environment for public transportation in Chicago. Then, it establishes a framework for assessing the potential effects of increased funding. A distinction is emphasized between measures that are internal to the agency, such as cost-effectiveness, and external measures of benefit to riders and the region. A simplified, strategic cost-benefit framework is outlined, focusing on three major benefit categories that drive political decision-making: transit rider mobility (or generalized cost), congestion mitigation, and regional air quality. Examination of the likely near-term effects of the financial crisis shows that additional funding is clearly justified in order to avoid the projected fare increases and ridership losses, even when the costs of public funding are included. However, achieving additional ridership growth through endogenous agency action is more difficult. It could be achieved through fare reductions, but political constraints make such a move unlikely. A straightforward expansion of service, even if targeted at buses and more responsive by Mark L. Schofield. S.M. 2005-09-27T17:24:58Z 2005-09-27T17:24:58Z 2004 2004 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/28631 58917805 en_US M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 119 p. 5721637 bytes 5736486 bytes application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf n-us-il Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Schofield, Mark L., 1973-
Evaluating the costs and benefits of increased funding for public transportation in Chicago
title Evaluating the costs and benefits of increased funding for public transportation in Chicago
title_full Evaluating the costs and benefits of increased funding for public transportation in Chicago
title_fullStr Evaluating the costs and benefits of increased funding for public transportation in Chicago
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the costs and benefits of increased funding for public transportation in Chicago
title_short Evaluating the costs and benefits of increased funding for public transportation in Chicago
title_sort evaluating the costs and benefits of increased funding for public transportation in chicago
topic Civil and Environmental Engineering.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/28631
work_keys_str_mv AT schofieldmarkl1973 evaluatingthecostsandbenefitsofincreasedfundingforpublictransportationinchicago