Characterizing cost and performance of flexibility strategies in autobody manufacturing

Thesis (M. Eng.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, 2005.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Povelaites, Jeffrey C
Other Authors: Randolph E. Kirchain, Jr.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33618
_version_ 1826209537328152576
author Povelaites, Jeffrey C
author2 Randolph E. Kirchain, Jr.
author_facet Randolph E. Kirchain, Jr.
Povelaites, Jeffrey C
author_sort Povelaites, Jeffrey C
collection MIT
description Thesis (M. Eng.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, 2005.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:24:02Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/33618
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:24:02Z
publishDate 2006
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/336182019-04-11T10:29:36Z Characterizing cost and performance of flexibility strategies in autobody manufacturing Povelaites, Jeffrey C Randolph E. Kirchain, Jr. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering. Materials Science and Engineering. Thesis (M. Eng.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, 2005. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 58-59). Consumer demand is hard to predict in any industry, let alone the automotive industry. Vehicle manufacturers try to produce according to what their customers want, but if these wants change, the company is faced with lots of unsold cars and a huge changeover cost. In order to help fight the problems of demand variability, automotive manufacturers have begun the move towards plant flexibility. This includes designing vehicles comprised of similar subassemblies and the development of flexible tooling. The hope is that multiple vehicles can be produced on the same line so if demand starts to fluctuate, they can change the production levels of their styles with minimal lead time. There are a number of different approaches to flexible tooling. One approach using programmable robotic repositionable tools (PRRT) is particularly promising because it can handle a large number of styles and requires low style specific reinvestment costs. This thesis examines the PRRT technology as well as other forms of flexible tooling to understand the conditions under which these approaches make the most economic sense. (cont.) For this project an algorithm was developed to choose assembly tools based on subassembly characteristics, production levels, style counts, and flexibility approaches. The algorithm was connected to an already existing vehicle assembly model and two forms of economic analysis were performed. The first looked at the costs of using PRRT versus other forms of tooling for various product mixes. The second analyzed the potential cost savings when considering product changeover. The results indicated that the initial outlays for PRRTs cannot be justified even for a large number of styles unless multi-generational product changeover is also considered. However, PRRTs provide a cost effective flexible tooling option for plants producing multiple styles when considering product changeovers. by Jeffrey C. Povelaites. M.Eng. 2006-07-31T15:17:32Z 2006-07-31T15:17:32Z 2005 2005 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33618 64391183 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 59 leaves 3951247 bytes 3953636 bytes application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Materials Science and Engineering.
Povelaites, Jeffrey C
Characterizing cost and performance of flexibility strategies in autobody manufacturing
title Characterizing cost and performance of flexibility strategies in autobody manufacturing
title_full Characterizing cost and performance of flexibility strategies in autobody manufacturing
title_fullStr Characterizing cost and performance of flexibility strategies in autobody manufacturing
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing cost and performance of flexibility strategies in autobody manufacturing
title_short Characterizing cost and performance of flexibility strategies in autobody manufacturing
title_sort characterizing cost and performance of flexibility strategies in autobody manufacturing
topic Materials Science and Engineering.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33618
work_keys_str_mv AT povelaitesjeffreyc characterizingcostandperformanceofflexibilitystrategiesinautobodymanufacturing