Representing systems through object-process methodology and axiomatic design
Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design & Management Program, 2002.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | eng |
| Published: |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2006
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34725 |
| _version_ | 1826213731036561408 |
|---|---|
| author | Soderborg, Nathan R., 1962- |
| author2 | Dov Dori and Edward F. Crawley. |
| author_facet | Dov Dori and Edward F. Crawley. Soderborg, Nathan R., 1962- |
| author_sort | Soderborg, Nathan R., 1962- |
| collection | MIT |
| description | Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design & Management Program, 2002. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-23T15:53:55Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | mit-1721.1/34725 |
| institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-23T15:53:55Z |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| publisher | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | mit-1721.1/347252019-04-10T08:18:39Z Representing systems through object-process methodology and axiomatic design Soderborg, Nathan R., 1962- Dov Dori and Edward F. Crawley. System Design and Management Program. System Design and Management Program. System Design and Management Program. Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design & Management Program, 2002. Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 104-105). Object-Process Methodology and Axiomatic Design are presented as two fundamentally different methods for representing systems. Strengths of the two methods are discussed and synergies are identified. The methods are shown to be complementary. When applied together as an integrated framework, they provide a system architect descriptive and evaluative capability unavailable from either methodology alone. The descriptive capabilities and definitional framework of Object-Process Methodology is used to improve formulation of Functional Requirements and Design Parameters in Axiomatic Design. Examples demonstrate that adequate descriptions of both function and architecture require a combination of objects and processes. Object- Process Methodology templates for describing function and architecture using such combinations are presented. Adherence to Axiomatic Design's Independence Axiom is evaluated through patterns identified in Object-Process Diagrams. by Nathan R. Soderborg. S.M. 2006-11-08T16:26:43Z 2006-11-08T16:26:43Z 2002 2002 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34725 50944745 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 107 leaves 4830671 bytes 4843447 bytes application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| spellingShingle | System Design and Management Program. Soderborg, Nathan R., 1962- Representing systems through object-process methodology and axiomatic design |
| title | Representing systems through object-process methodology and axiomatic design |
| title_full | Representing systems through object-process methodology and axiomatic design |
| title_fullStr | Representing systems through object-process methodology and axiomatic design |
| title_full_unstemmed | Representing systems through object-process methodology and axiomatic design |
| title_short | Representing systems through object-process methodology and axiomatic design |
| title_sort | representing systems through object process methodology and axiomatic design |
| topic | System Design and Management Program. |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34725 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT soderborgnathanr1962 representingsystemsthroughobjectprocessmethodologyandaxiomaticdesign |