The Conditional CAPM Does Not Explain Asset-pricing Anomalies

Recent studies suggest that the conditional CAPM might hold, period-by-period, and that time-varying betas can explain the failures of the simple, unconditional CAPM. We argue, however, that significant departures from the unconditional CAPM would require implausibly large time-variation in betas an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LEWELLEN, JONATHAN, NAGEL, STEFAN
Format: Working Paper
Language:en_US
Published: 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3544
_version_ 1811094431306088448
author LEWELLEN, JONATHAN
NAGEL, STEFAN
author_facet LEWELLEN, JONATHAN
NAGEL, STEFAN
author_sort LEWELLEN, JONATHAN
collection MIT
description Recent studies suggest that the conditional CAPM might hold, period-by-period, and that time-varying betas can explain the failures of the simple, unconditional CAPM. We argue, however, that significant departures from the unconditional CAPM would require implausibly large time-variation in betas and expected returns. Thus, the conditional CAPM is unlikely to explain asset-pricing anomalies like book-to-market and momentum. We test this conjecture empirically by directly estimating conditional alphas and betas from short-window regressions (avoiding the need to specify conditioning information). The tests show, consistent with our analytical results, that the conditional CAPM performs nearly as poorly as the unconditional CAP
first_indexed 2024-09-23T15:59:38Z
format Working Paper
id mit-1721.1/3544
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T15:59:38Z
publishDate 2003
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/35442019-04-12T08:25:01Z The Conditional CAPM Does Not Explain Asset-pricing Anomalies LEWELLEN, JONATHAN NAGEL, STEFAN Time-varying betas conditional CAPM asset-pricing anomalies book-to-market momentum Recent studies suggest that the conditional CAPM might hold, period-by-period, and that time-varying betas can explain the failures of the simple, unconditional CAPM. We argue, however, that significant departures from the unconditional CAPM would require implausibly large time-variation in betas and expected returns. Thus, the conditional CAPM is unlikely to explain asset-pricing anomalies like book-to-market and momentum. We test this conjecture empirically by directly estimating conditional alphas and betas from short-window regressions (avoiding the need to specify conditioning information). The tests show, consistent with our analytical results, that the conditional CAPM performs nearly as poorly as the unconditional CAP 2003-09-16T19:24:19Z 2003-09-16T19:24:19Z 2003-09-16T19:24:19Z Working Paper http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3544 en_US MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper;4427-03 318782 bytes application/pdf application/pdf
spellingShingle Time-varying betas
conditional CAPM
asset-pricing anomalies
book-to-market
momentum
LEWELLEN, JONATHAN
NAGEL, STEFAN
The Conditional CAPM Does Not Explain Asset-pricing Anomalies
title The Conditional CAPM Does Not Explain Asset-pricing Anomalies
title_full The Conditional CAPM Does Not Explain Asset-pricing Anomalies
title_fullStr The Conditional CAPM Does Not Explain Asset-pricing Anomalies
title_full_unstemmed The Conditional CAPM Does Not Explain Asset-pricing Anomalies
title_short The Conditional CAPM Does Not Explain Asset-pricing Anomalies
title_sort conditional capm does not explain asset pricing anomalies
topic Time-varying betas
conditional CAPM
asset-pricing anomalies
book-to-market
momentum
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3544
work_keys_str_mv AT lewellenjonathan theconditionalcapmdoesnotexplainassetpricinganomalies
AT nagelstefan theconditionalcapmdoesnotexplainassetpricinganomalies
AT lewellenjonathan conditionalcapmdoesnotexplainassetpricinganomalies
AT nagelstefan conditionalcapmdoesnotexplainassetpricinganomalies