Regulatory competition and the politics of environmental enforcement

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2006.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Konisky, David M
Other Authors: Stephen M. Meyer.
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/35542
_version_ 1826199332753244160
author Konisky, David M
author2 Stephen M. Meyer.
author_facet Stephen M. Meyer.
Konisky, David M
author_sort Konisky, David M
collection MIT
description Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2006.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T11:18:32Z
format Thesis
id mit-1721.1/35542
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language eng
last_indexed 2024-09-23T11:18:32Z
publishDate 2007
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/355422019-04-11T06:55:23Z Regulatory competition and the politics of environmental enforcement Konisky, David M Stephen M. Meyer. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Political Science. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Political Science. Political Science. Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2006. Includes bibliographical references (p. 239-258). Does interstate economic competition result in states weakening their environmental regulation? Scholars have long been interested in this question. Of particular concern, is whether this type of behavior leads to a "race to the bottom" in U.S. state environmental regulatory behavior. Although there is a mature theoretical literature investigating the conditions under which regulators will use environmental measures as competitive instruments vis-a.-vis other states for attracting economic investment, the empirical literature has lagged far behind in testing the direct predictions of the race to the bottom argument. The purpose of this project is test the applicability of the race to the bottom argument in U.S. state environmental regulation. To test the race to the bottom argument, I examine both behavioral' and attitudinal evidence. Specifically, I estimate a series of strategic interaction models which aim to detect whether state enforcement of three federal pollution control programs - the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act - follows a pattern consistent with regulatory competition theory generally, and the race to the bottom argument specifically. I also conduct a nationwide survey of senior officials working in state environmental agencies. (cont.) This elite level survey helps to validate the behavioral evidence studied in the statistical analysis, as well as elucidates the mechanisms of regulatory competition within states. My research finds strong evidence that state environmental regulatory behavior is interdependent - that is, state regulatory agencies respond to the regulatory behavior of the states with which they compete for economic investment. Evidence from both the statistical analysis of state enforcement data and the survey of state environmental regulators supports this conclusion. The evidence for a race to the bottom is less clear. While I do find that some states weaken their environmental regulatory effort in response to interstate economic competition, I also find that other states strengthen their regulatory effort, which supports an alternative race to the top argument. In the final part of the dissertation, I reconcile these results by identifying the factors that make particular states more susceptible to race to the bottom-type behavior. by David M. Konisky. Ph.D. 2007-01-10T16:35:40Z 2007-01-10T16:35:40Z 2006 2006 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/35542 73526262 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 258 p. 16976978 bytes 16994704 bytes application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
spellingShingle Political Science.
Konisky, David M
Regulatory competition and the politics of environmental enforcement
title Regulatory competition and the politics of environmental enforcement
title_full Regulatory competition and the politics of environmental enforcement
title_fullStr Regulatory competition and the politics of environmental enforcement
title_full_unstemmed Regulatory competition and the politics of environmental enforcement
title_short Regulatory competition and the politics of environmental enforcement
title_sort regulatory competition and the politics of environmental enforcement
topic Political Science.
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/35542
work_keys_str_mv AT koniskydavidm regulatorycompetitionandthepoliticsofenvironmentalenforcement