Annex I differentiation proposals : implications for welfare, equity and policy
Includes bibliographical references (p. 19-20).
| Other Authors: | |
|---|---|
| Language: | eng |
| Published: |
MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change
2003
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://mit.edu/globalchange/www/abstracts.html#a27 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3621 |
| _version_ | 1811076854060154880 |
|---|---|
| author2 | Reiner, David M. |
| author_facet | Reiner, David M. |
| collection | MIT |
| description | Includes bibliographical references (p. 19-20). |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-23T10:29:00Z |
| id | mit-1721.1/3621 |
| institution | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-23T10:29:00Z |
| publishDate | 2003 |
| publisher | MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | mit-1721.1/36212019-04-12T07:58:26Z Annex I differentiation proposals : implications for welfare, equity and policy Reiner, David M. Jacoby, Henry D. QC981.8.C5 M58 no.27 Includes bibliographical references (p. 19-20). Abstract in HTML and technical report in HTML and PDF available on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change website (http://mit.edu/globalchange/www/) Drawing upon a variety of different criteria, many nations have introduced proposals to differentiate the reductions in carbon emissions that would be required of industrialized nations in the short to medium term. This paper considers the relationship of these proposals to their underlying conceptions of equity, and to the self-interest of the nations proposing them. The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Assessment (EPPA) model is used to analyze the welfare implications of several prominent proposals, considering both cases where nations must carry out all emissions reductions domestically, and situations where trading in emissions permits is allowed. The consequences of applying two prominent differentiation measures to a global regime using a zero-based allocation of emissions rights is also explored. One conclusion is that a trading regime can yield important benefits in reducing potential conflict within developed nations, and help avoid complicated and divisive negotiations over burden-sharing formulas. 2003-10-24T14:57:24Z 2003-10-24T14:57:24Z 1997-10 no. 27 http://mit.edu/globalchange/www/abstracts.html#a27 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3621 eng Report no. 27 20 p. 72269 bytes application/pdf application/pdf MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change |
| spellingShingle | QC981.8.C5 M58 no.27 Annex I differentiation proposals : implications for welfare, equity and policy |
| title | Annex I differentiation proposals : implications for welfare, equity and policy |
| title_full | Annex I differentiation proposals : implications for welfare, equity and policy |
| title_fullStr | Annex I differentiation proposals : implications for welfare, equity and policy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Annex I differentiation proposals : implications for welfare, equity and policy |
| title_short | Annex I differentiation proposals : implications for welfare, equity and policy |
| title_sort | annex i differentiation proposals implications for welfare equity and policy |
| topic | QC981.8.C5 M58 no.27 |
| url | http://mit.edu/globalchange/www/abstracts.html#a27 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3621 |