Is international emissions trading always beneficial?

Abstract in HTML and technical report in PDF available on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change website (http://mit.edu/globalchange/www/).

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Babiker, Mustafa H.M., Reilly, John M., Viguier, Laurent L.
Language:en_US
Published: 2003
Online Access:http://mit.edu/globalchange/www/abstracts.html#a93
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3628
_version_ 1811088259361538048
author Babiker, Mustafa H.M.
Reilly, John M.
Viguier, Laurent L.
author_facet Babiker, Mustafa H.M.
Reilly, John M.
Viguier, Laurent L.
author_sort Babiker, Mustafa H.M.
collection MIT
description Abstract in HTML and technical report in PDF available on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change website (http://mit.edu/globalchange/www/).
first_indexed 2024-09-23T13:59:19Z
id mit-1721.1/3628
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T13:59:19Z
publishDate 2003
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/36282019-04-12T07:58:27Z Is international emissions trading always beneficial? Babiker, Mustafa H.M. Reilly, John M. Viguier, Laurent L. Abstract in HTML and technical report in PDF available on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change website (http://mit.edu/globalchange/www/). Economic efficiency is a major argument for the inclusion of an international emission permit trading system under the Kyoto Protocol. Using a partial equilibrium framework, energy system models have shown that implementing tradable permits for greenhouse gases internationally could reduce compliance costs associated with the emission targets. However, we show that international emission trading could be welfare decreasing under a general equilibrium framework. We describe a case of immiserizing growth in the sense of Bhagwati where the negative terms of trade and tax-interaction effects wipeout the primary income gains from emission trading. Immiserizing emission trading occurs only when there are pre-existing distortions in the economy. Simulation results based on a CGE model developed at MIT (the EPPA model) show that under an EU-wide emission trading regime the introduction of a permit trading system cause welfare losses for some of the trading countries. 2003-10-24T14:57:35Z 2003-10-24T14:57:35Z 2002-12 no. 93 http://mit.edu/globalchange/www/abstracts.html#a93 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3628 en_US Report no. 93 26 p. 503009 bytes application/pdf application/pdf
spellingShingle Babiker, Mustafa H.M.
Reilly, John M.
Viguier, Laurent L.
Is international emissions trading always beneficial?
title Is international emissions trading always beneficial?
title_full Is international emissions trading always beneficial?
title_fullStr Is international emissions trading always beneficial?
title_full_unstemmed Is international emissions trading always beneficial?
title_short Is international emissions trading always beneficial?
title_sort is international emissions trading always beneficial
url http://mit.edu/globalchange/www/abstracts.html#a93
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3628
work_keys_str_mv AT babikermustafahm isinternationalemissionstradingalwaysbeneficial
AT reillyjohnm isinternationalemissionstradingalwaysbeneficial
AT viguierlaurentl isinternationalemissionstradingalwaysbeneficial