Fatal Void Size Comparisons in Via-Below and Via-Above Cu Dual-Damascene Interconnects

The median-times-to-failure (t₅₀’s) for straight dual-damascene via-terminated copper interconnect structures, tested under the same conditions, depend on whether the vias connect down to underlaying leads (metal 2, M2, or via-below structures) or connect up to overlaying leads...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Choi, Z.-S., Gan, C.L., Wei, F., Thompson, Carl V., Lee, J.H., Marieb, T., Maiz, J., Pey, Kin Leong, Choi, Wee Kiong
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3826
_version_ 1811090313878437888
author Choi, Z.-S.
Gan, C.L.
Wei, F.
Thompson, Carl V.
Lee, J.H.
Marieb, T.
Maiz, J.
Pey, Kin Leong
Choi, Wee Kiong
author_facet Choi, Z.-S.
Gan, C.L.
Wei, F.
Thompson, Carl V.
Lee, J.H.
Marieb, T.
Maiz, J.
Pey, Kin Leong
Choi, Wee Kiong
author_sort Choi, Z.-S.
collection MIT
description The median-times-to-failure (t₅₀’s) for straight dual-damascene via-terminated copper interconnect structures, tested under the same conditions, depend on whether the vias connect down to underlaying leads (metal 2, M2, or via-below structures) or connect up to overlaying leads (metal 1, M1, or via-above structures). Experimental results for a variety of line lengths, widths, and numbers of vias show higher t₅₀’s for M2 structures than for analogous M1 structures. It has been shown that despite this asymmetry in lifetimes, the electromigration drift velocity is the same for these two types of structures, suggesting that fatal void volumes are different in these two cases. A numerical simulation tool based on the Korhonen model has been developed and used to simulate the conditions for void growth and correlate fatal void sizes with lifetimes. These simulations suggest that the average fatal void size for M2 structures is more than twice the size of that of M1 structures. This result supports an earlier suggestion that preferential nucleation at the Cu/Si₃N₄ interface in both M1 and M2 structures leads to different fatal void sizes, because larger voids are required to span the line thickness in M2 structures while smaller voids at the base of vias can cause failures in M1 structures. However, it is also found that the fatal void sizes corresponding to the shortest-times-to-failure (STTF’s) are similar for M1 and M2, suggesting that the voids that lead to the shortest lifetimes occur at or in the vias in both cases, where a void need only span the via to cause failure. Correlation of lifetimes and critical void volumes provides a useful tool for distinguishing failure mechanisms.
first_indexed 2024-09-23T14:41:22Z
format Article
id mit-1721.1/3826
institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology
language en_US
last_indexed 2024-09-23T14:41:22Z
publishDate 2003
record_format dspace
spelling mit-1721.1/38262019-04-11T08:18:41Z Fatal Void Size Comparisons in Via-Below and Via-Above Cu Dual-Damascene Interconnects Choi, Z.-S. Gan, C.L. Wei, F. Thompson, Carl V. Lee, J.H. Marieb, T. Maiz, J. Pey, Kin Leong Choi, Wee Kiong copper interconnect electromigration reliability The median-times-to-failure (t₅₀’s) for straight dual-damascene via-terminated copper interconnect structures, tested under the same conditions, depend on whether the vias connect down to underlaying leads (metal 2, M2, or via-below structures) or connect up to overlaying leads (metal 1, M1, or via-above structures). Experimental results for a variety of line lengths, widths, and numbers of vias show higher t₅₀’s for M2 structures than for analogous M1 structures. It has been shown that despite this asymmetry in lifetimes, the electromigration drift velocity is the same for these two types of structures, suggesting that fatal void volumes are different in these two cases. A numerical simulation tool based on the Korhonen model has been developed and used to simulate the conditions for void growth and correlate fatal void sizes with lifetimes. These simulations suggest that the average fatal void size for M2 structures is more than twice the size of that of M1 structures. This result supports an earlier suggestion that preferential nucleation at the Cu/Si₃N₄ interface in both M1 and M2 structures leads to different fatal void sizes, because larger voids are required to span the line thickness in M2 structures while smaller voids at the base of vias can cause failures in M1 structures. However, it is also found that the fatal void sizes corresponding to the shortest-times-to-failure (STTF’s) are similar for M1 and M2, suggesting that the voids that lead to the shortest lifetimes occur at or in the vias in both cases, where a void need only span the via to cause failure. Correlation of lifetimes and critical void volumes provides a useful tool for distinguishing failure mechanisms. Singapore-MIT Alliance (SMA) 2003-12-13T16:27:34Z 2003-12-13T16:27:34Z 2004-01 Article http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3826 en_US Advanced Materials for Micro- and Nano-Systems (AMMNS); 385354 bytes application/pdf application/pdf
spellingShingle copper
interconnect
electromigration
reliability
Choi, Z.-S.
Gan, C.L.
Wei, F.
Thompson, Carl V.
Lee, J.H.
Marieb, T.
Maiz, J.
Pey, Kin Leong
Choi, Wee Kiong
Fatal Void Size Comparisons in Via-Below and Via-Above Cu Dual-Damascene Interconnects
title Fatal Void Size Comparisons in Via-Below and Via-Above Cu Dual-Damascene Interconnects
title_full Fatal Void Size Comparisons in Via-Below and Via-Above Cu Dual-Damascene Interconnects
title_fullStr Fatal Void Size Comparisons in Via-Below and Via-Above Cu Dual-Damascene Interconnects
title_full_unstemmed Fatal Void Size Comparisons in Via-Below and Via-Above Cu Dual-Damascene Interconnects
title_short Fatal Void Size Comparisons in Via-Below and Via-Above Cu Dual-Damascene Interconnects
title_sort fatal void size comparisons in via below and via above cu dual damascene interconnects
topic copper
interconnect
electromigration
reliability
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/3826
work_keys_str_mv AT choizs fatalvoidsizecomparisonsinviabelowandviaabovecudualdamasceneinterconnects
AT gancl fatalvoidsizecomparisonsinviabelowandviaabovecudualdamasceneinterconnects
AT weif fatalvoidsizecomparisonsinviabelowandviaabovecudualdamasceneinterconnects
AT thompsoncarlv fatalvoidsizecomparisonsinviabelowandviaabovecudualdamasceneinterconnects
AT leejh fatalvoidsizecomparisonsinviabelowandviaabovecudualdamasceneinterconnects
AT mariebt fatalvoidsizecomparisonsinviabelowandviaabovecudualdamasceneinterconnects
AT maizj fatalvoidsizecomparisonsinviabelowandviaabovecudualdamasceneinterconnects
AT peykinleong fatalvoidsizecomparisonsinviabelowandviaabovecudualdamasceneinterconnects
AT choiweekiong fatalvoidsizecomparisonsinviabelowandviaabovecudualdamasceneinterconnects